The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing the Homogenous Nature of Central Courtyard Structure in Formation of Iranian Traditional Houses
Open accessAbstract
In historical cities and especially traditional houses in 17-19 century A.D in Iran, vacuum model (central courtyard) as one of the most fundamental concepts, has always played a key role in organizing Iranian cities at large scale and consequently houses at a micro scale. In the spatial organization of traditional houses, the central courtyard, among other spatial elements, has consistently played the role of a homogenizer and organizer rather than a neutral factor. Generally in the vast range of Iranian central cities including Isfahan, Shiraz and Yazd, courtyard has had a homogeneous and fluid nature, and has acted as a link between different spaces and contributed to the continuity of space in the traditional houses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Traditional houses often feature a tripartite structure with the central yard as the core element. This primary space is distinguished by its size, abundant natural light, and open sky exposure (Amiriparyan and Kiani 2016).”
From Socio-cultural transformations in modernity and household patterns: a study on local traditions housing and the impact and evolution of vernacular architecture in Yazd, Iran (2024) · cites this paper as Amiriparyan and Kiani 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Omranipoor, 2005, The Islamic art and architecture of Iran, Urban development and revitalization organization working group publications: Tehran
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Formolly, A., & Saraei, M. H. (2024) · City, Territory and Architecture · doi:10.1186/s40410-024-00236-6 · Cited by 21
“This primary space is distinguished by its size, abundant natural light, and open sky exposure (Amiriparyan and Kiani 2016).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Amiriparyan, P., & Kiani, Z.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Amiriparyan, Peyman
- Venue
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 216
- Pages
- 905-915
- ISSN
- 1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2283677963
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Architecture and Cultural Influences
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architectural and Urban Studies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
- Keywords
- central courtyard, courtyard houses, spatial organization, spatial continuity, urban form, 17th-19th century architecture, Isfahan, Shiraz, Yazd
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
