Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60Work-Family Balance ChallengesCorporate Management and LeadershipEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to achieve sustainable efficiency with teleworkers: Leadership model in telework.

Open access
Wojcak, Emil, Bajzikova, Lubica, Sajgalikova, Helena, Polakova, Michaela·2016·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.111
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Globalization, increasing competition, changes in demographic structure of population, and development of information and communication technologies (ICT) are the factors that have posed new challenges for organizations in recent years. The newly fledged conditions have vital impact on production methods and procedures as well as work arrangements in organizations. Currently, organizations cope with various times in which work is executed as well as various places where it is executed. Thanks to ICT an employee can work at the client's place, at home, in a means of transport or in a café. All these situations constitute the work arrangement in which the worker is considered to work ‘from distance’, i.e. as a teleworker. The presented approach refers to the flexible work arrangement where an organization's priority lies with its endeavour to become and stay flexible in terms of time and place of performance. Under these conditions the implementation of new ways of work arrangements presents new challenges for leadership. To accomplish this basic function of management when employees are not present at workplace or even are not available during working hours and face-to-face communication is impossible poses many difficulties. The paper focuses on comparison and identification of the differences between traditional work arrangements and telework, highlights weak points in leadership of teleworkers, and proposes a leadership model for teleworkers’ induction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.111

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H. & Wojcak, E. (2006). Flexible work organization: Unity or discrepancy between employers and employees. In: AGB and IALBSS Proceedings. Vol 18. Newport Beach : Association for Global Business, 16 p.
  2. Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H. & Wojcak, E. (2011). Flexibility in knowledge - intensive sectors (Case of Slovakia). In: Building capabilities for sustainable global business : Balancing corporate success and social good. Volume III. Montclair : Montclair State University, pp. 1689-1700.
  3. Kolenak, J. & Brezovska Novotna, B. (2015). Stres a jeho vliv na kvalitu profesniho zivota. In: Trendy personalni prace pro narocna prostredi. Praha : Newton Books, pp. 22-36.
  4. Majercakova, D. & Mittelman, A. (2014). A model for measuring social and economic impact in social service organizations in Slovakia. Journal of East European science and research. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 150-161.
  5. Majercakova, D. & Slahor, L. (2013). Leadership and management development in social service organizations. Theory and practice management. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenskeho v Bratislava. pp. 60-65.
  6. Novackova, D. (2014). Volny pohyb osob. Vnutorné politiky a cinnosti Europskej unie. Plzen : Ales Cenek, pp. 57-72.
  7. Pyoria, P. (2011). Managing telework: risk, fears and rules. Management Research Review. Volume 34, Issue 4. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 386-399.
  8. Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2008). Essentials of organizational behavior. (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 857 p.
  9. Wojcak, E. & Polakova, M. (2014). Uplatnovanie teleprace (prilezitosti a hrozby). Hradecke ekonomicke dny: ekonomicky rozvoj a management regionu. Hradec Kralove: Gaudeamus, pp. 350-357.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wojcak, E., Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H., & Polakova, M.
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
229
Pages
33-41
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.111
OpenAlex
W2510962085
Cited by
60
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
remote work, leadership models, flexible work arrangements, employee induction, information and communication technologies, work arrangements, sustainable efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.