Cited by 149Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryDisability Education and Employment

Cognitive predictors of psychosocial functioning outcome in schizophrenia: a follow-up study of subjects participating in a rehabilitation program

Prouteau, Antoinette, Verdoux, Hélène, Briand, Catherine, Lesage, Alain, Lalonde, Pierre, Nicole, Luc, Reinharz, Daniel, Stip, Emmanuel·2005·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

The aims of this prospective study were to explore in subjects with psychosis participating in a rehabilitation program whether cognitive performances at baseline predicted (i) psychosocial functioning over a 15-16 month follow-up; (ii) improvement in psychosocial functioning over the rehabilitation program. Visuo-spatial tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) were administered to assess cognitive performance in 55 subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who completed a rehabilitation program. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS) was used to measure dimensions of community functioning. One subscale of the Client's Assessment of Strengths, Interests, and Goals (CASIG) provided a measure of subjective quality of life (QoL). Improvement was defined as a 15% or more increase in psychosocial scores between baseline and follow-up. Worse baseline sustained attention predicted better self-rated quality of life, and better baseline visual memory predicted better community functioning over the rehabilitation follow-up period, in particular, higher autonomy in activities of daily living, and less physical and psychiatric symptoms that could interfere with rehabilitation. Baseline cognitive performances predicted community functioning improvement during the follow-up period: visual memory predicted improvement in daily living autonomy and in social competence; sustained attention predicted improvement in behavioral problems (such as medication compliance, collaboration with treatment providers or impulse control) and social competence; planning performances predicted improvement in social competence. These cognitive functions could be specifically targeted in a rehabilitation program aimed at enhancing functioning in those particular dimensions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 149

Authors
Prouteau, A., Verdoux, H., Briand, C., Lesage, A., Lalonde, P., Nicole, L., Reinharz, D., & Stip, E.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
77
Issue
2-3
Pages
343-353
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160274416
Cited by
149
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
schizophrenia, cognitive predictors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Likelihood Functions, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review