Cited by 715Schizophrenia research and treatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia

Ellison-Wright, Ian, Bullmore, Ed·2009·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify whether there are consistent regional white matter changes in schizophrenia. A systematic search was conducted for voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging fractional anisotropy studies of patients with schizophrenia (or related disorders) in relation to comparison groups. The authors carried out meta-analysis of the co-ordinates of fractional anisotropy differences. For the meta-analysis they used the Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) method hybridized with the rank approach used in Genome Scan Meta-Analysis (GSMA). This system detects three-dimensional conjunctions of co-ordinates from multiple studies and permits the weighting of studies in relation to sample size. Fifteen articles were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis, including a total of 407 patients with schizophrenia and 383 comparison subjects. The studies reported fractional anisotropy reductions at 112 co-ordinates in schizophrenia and no fractional anisotropy increases. Over all studies, significant reductions were present in two regions: the left frontal deep white matter and the left temporal deep white matter. The first region, in the left frontal lobe, is traversed by white matter tracts interconnecting the frontal lobe, thalamus and cingulate gyrus. The second region, in the temporal lobe, is traversed by white matter tracts interconnecting the frontal lobe, insula, hippocampus-amygdala, temporal and occipital lobe. This suggests that two networks of white matter tracts may be affected in schizophrenia, with the potential for 'disconnection' of the gray matter regions which they link.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 715

Authors
Ellison-Wright, I., & Bullmore, E.
Affiliations
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Ellison-Wright, Ian
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
108
Issue
1-3
Pages
3-10
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059764671
Cited by
715
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 52
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
schizophrenia, white matter
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Schizophrenia, Databases, Factual, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review