Cited by 116Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Does dopamine mediate the psychosis-inducing effects of cannabis? A review and integration of findings across disciplines

Kuepper, Rebecca, Morrison, Paul D., van Os, Jim, Murray, Robin M., Kenis, Gunter, Henquet, Cécile·2010·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

General population epidemiological studies have consistently found that cannabis use increases the risk of developing psychotic disorders in a dose-dependent manner. While the epidemiological signal between cannabis and psychosis has gained considerable attention, the biological mechanism whereby cannabis increases risk for psychosis remains poorly understood. Animal research suggests that delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the main psychoactive component of cannabis) increases dopamine levels in several regions of the brain, including striatal and prefrontal areas. Since dopamine is hypothesized to represent a crucial common final pathway between brain biology and actual experience of psychosis, a focus on dopamine may initially be productive in the examination of the psychotomimetic effects of cannabis. Therefore, this review examines the evidence concerning the interactions between THC, endocannabinoids and dopamine in the cortical as well as subcortical regions implicated in psychosis, and considers possible mechanisms whereby cannabis-induced dopamine dysregulation may give rise to delusions and hallucinations. It is concluded that further study of the mechanisms underlying the link between cannabis and psychosis may be conducted productively from the perspective of progressive developmental sensitization, resulting from gene-environment interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurobiological evidence on the effect of cannabis use, which includes dopaminergic, glutaminergic, and GABA activity modulation, is broadly consistent with the current understanding of neurobiology of psychotic disorders.

    “Neurobiological evidence on the effect of cannabis use, which includes dopaminergic, glutaminergic, and GABA activity modulation, are broadly consistent with the current understanding of neurobiology of psychotic disorders (55), as discussed in other articles in this issue (refs).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 167 · Cited by 116

Authors
Kuepper, R., Morrison, P. D., van Os, J., Murray, R. M., Kenis, G., & Henquet, C.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Henquet, Cécile
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
121
Issue
1-3
Pages
107-117
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037466665
Cited by
116
References
167
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cannabis, psychosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Cerebral Cortex, Dopamine, Humans, Neural Pathways, Psychotic Disorders, Dronabinol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review