Cited by 36Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Denial of illness in schizophrenia as a disturbance of self-reflection, self-perception and insight

Bedford, Nicholas J., David, Anthony S.·2014·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of schizophrenia patients deny aspects of their illness to others, which may indicate a deeper disturbance of 'insight' and a self-reflection deficit. The present study used a 'levels-of-processing' mnemonic paradigm to examine whether such patients engage in particularly brief and shallow self-reflection during mental illness-related self-evaluation. METHODS: 26 schizophrenia patients with either an overall acceptance or denial of their illness and 25 healthy controls made timed decisions about the self-descriptiveness, other-person-descriptiveness and phonological properties of mental illness traits, negative traits and positive traits, before completing surprise tests of retrieval for these traits. RESULTS: The acceptance patients and denial patients were particularly slow in their mental illness-related self-evaluation, indicating that they both found this exercise particularly difficult. Both patient groups displayed intact recognition but particularly reduced recall for self-evaluated traits in general, possibly indicating poor organisational processing during self-reflection. Lower recall for self-evaluated mental illness traits significantly correlated with higher denial of illness and higher illness-severity. Whilst explicit and implicit measures of self-perception corresponded in the healthy controls (who displayed an intact positive>negative 'self-positivity bias') and acceptance patients (who displayed a reduced self-positivity bias), the denial patients' self-positivity bias was explicitly intact but implicitly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenia patients, regardless of their illness-attitudes, have a particular deficit in recalling new self-related information that worsens with increasing denial of illness. This deficit may contribute towards rigid self-perception and disturbed self-awareness and insight in patients with denial of illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 36

Authors
Bedford, N. J., & David, A. S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bedford, Nicholas J.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
152
Issue
1
Pages
89-96
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063342839
Cited by
36
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
schizophrenia, denial of illness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Awareness, Denial, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Perception, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review