Cited by 47Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Insight in inpatients with schizophrenia: Relationship to symptoms and neuropsychological functioning

Zhou, Yanling, Rosenheck, Robert, Mohamed, Somaia, Zhang, Jie, Chang, Qing, Ou, Yufen, Sun, Bin, Ning, Yuping +1 more·2015·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Objective Lack of insight into illness has long been recognized as a central characteristic of schizophrenia. Although recent theories have emphasized neurocognitive dysfunction as a central impairment in schizophrenia it remains unclear whether the lack of insight in schizophrenia is more strongly associated with measures of symptom severity or neuropsychological dysfunction.Methods Seventy-four consecutive inpatients with chronic schizophrenia were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. All subjects were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS, five-factor model), the Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire (ITAQ), and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Bivariate association and multiple linear regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between insight and both symptoms and neurocognition.Results On bivariate correlation, the positive, negative, disorganized and excited factors of the PANSS showed a negative correlation with insight but there was no significant association between the MCCB total score or any component subscale and insight. Multiple regression analysis showed that positive symptoms, disorganized/concrete symptoms and excited symptoms contributed to awareness of mental illness; positive and disorganized/concrete symptoms were significant contributors to awareness of the need for treatment; but there were no significant associations with the MCCB.Conclusions Insight in this sample of patients with chronic schizophrenia is significantly associated with clinical symptoms but not with neuropsychological functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2014.12.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 47

Authors
Zhou, Y., Rosenheck, R., Mohamed, S., Zhang, J., Chang, Q., Ou, Y., Sun, B., Ning, Y., & He, H.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital (CN)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
He, Hongbo
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
161
Issue
2-3
Pages
376-381
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983818247
Cited by
47
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
insight into illness, chronic schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review