Cited by 24Schizophrenia research and treatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health and Psychiatry

Insight and white matter fractional anisotropy in first-episode schizophrenia

Open access
Asmal, Laila, du Plessis, Stefan, Vink, Matthijs, Fouche, Jean-Paul, Chiliza, Bonginkosi, Emsley, Robin·2017·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Impaired insight is a hallmark feature of schizophrenia. Structural studies implicate predominantly prefrontal, cingulate, cuneus/precuneus, and inferior temporal brain regions. The cortical midline structures (CMS) are also implicated in functional studies primarily through self-reflective processing tasks. However, few studies have explored the relationship between white matter tracts and insight in schizophrenia, and none in first-episode schizophrenia (FES). Here, we examined for fractional anisotropy (FA) differences in 89 minimally treated FES patients and 98 matched controls, and identified those FA differences associated with impaired clinical insight in patients. We found widespread FA reduction in FES patients compared to controls. Poorer insight in patients was predicted by lower FA values in a number of white matter tracts with a predilection for tracts associated with cortical midline structures (fronto-occipital, cingulate, cingulate hippocampus, uncinate, anterior corona radiata), and more severe depressive symptoms. The association between FA abnormalities and insight was most robust for the awareness of symptoms and illness awareness domains. Our study implicates a network of tracts involved in impaired insight in schizophrenia with a predilection for the CMS. This study is a first step in delineating the white matter tracts involved in insight impairment in schizophrenia prior to chronicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2016.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 24

Authors
Asmal, L., du Plessis, S., Vink, M., Fouche, J.-P., Chiliza, B., & Emsley, R.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Asmal, Laila
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
183
Pages
88-94
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2553580808
Cited by
24
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
clinical insight, first-episode schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Anisotropy, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review