Cited by 85Schizophrenia research and treatmentDisability Education and EmploymentCognitive Functions and Memory

Compensatory cognitive training for people with severe mental illnesses in supported employment: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Twamley, Elizabeth W., Thomas, Kelsey R., Burton, Cynthia Z., Vella, Lea, Jeste, Dilip V., Heaton, Robert K., McGurk, Susan R.·2019·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Treatments for cognitive and functional impairments associated with severe mental illnesses are urgently needed. We tested a 12-week, manualized, Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) intervention targeting prospective memory, attention, learning/memory, and executive functioning in the context of supported employment for people with severe mental illnesses who were seeking work. 153 unemployed, work-seeking outpatients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (n=58), bipolar disorder (n=37), or major depression (n=58) were randomized to receive supported employment plus CCT or enhanced supported employment, a robust control group. Assessments of neuropsychological performance, functional capacity, psychiatric symptom severity, and self-reported functioning and quality of life were administered at baseline and multiple follow-up assessments over two years; work outcomes were collected for two years. Forty-seven percent of the participants obtained competitive work, but there were no differences in work attainment, weeks worked, or wages earned between the CCT and the enhanced supported employment group. ANCOVAs assessing immediate post-treatment effects demonstrated significant, medium to large, CCT-associated improvements on measures of working memory (p=0.038), depressive symptom severity (p=0.023), and quality of life (p=0.003). Longer-term results revealed no statistically significant CCT-associated improvements, but a trend (p=0.058) toward a small to medium CCT-associated improvement in learning. Diagnostic group (schizophrenia-spectrum vs. mood disorder) did not affect outcomes. We conclude that CCT has the potential to improve cognitive performance, psychiatric symptom severity, and quality of life in people with severe mental illnesses. Receiving CCT did not result in better work outcomes, suggesting that supported employment can result in competitive work regardless of cognitive status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RCTs have shown significant improvement with other manualized psychosocial interventions in older patients with schizophrenia, such as supported employment with or without compensatory cognitive training, to help them obtain and retain paid jobs.

    “Randomized controlled trials have also shown significant improvement with other manualized psychosocial interventions in older patients with schizophrenia, such as supported employment without and with compensatory cognitive training to help them obtain and retain paid jobs282, 283.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 85

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams J 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. SCID-I/P Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York

Authors
Twamley, E. W., Thomas, K. R., Burton, C. Z., Vella, L., Jeste, D. V., Heaton, R. K., & McGurk, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Twamley, Elizabeth W.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
203
Pages
41-48
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2747591530
Cited by
85
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (R01MH080150, T32MH018399)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
compensatory cognitive training, severe mental illness
MeSH terms
Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Cognitive Remediation, Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Employment, Supported, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review