Cited by 32Neural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Altered predictive capability of the brain network EEG model in schizophrenia during cognition

Open access
Gomez-Pilar, Javier, Poza, Jesús, Gómez, Carlos, Northoff, Georg, Lubeiro, Alba, Cea-Cañas, Benjamín B., Molina, Vicente, Hornero, Roberto·2018·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

The study of the mechanisms involved in cognition is of paramount importance for the understanding of the neurobiological substrates in psychiatric disorders. Hence, this research is aimed at exploring the brain network dynamics during a cognitive task. Specifically, we analyze the predictive capability of the pre-stimulus theta activity to ascertain the functional brain dynamics during cognition in both healthy and schizophrenia subjects. Firstly, EEG recordings were acquired during a three-tone oddball task from fifty-one healthy subjects and thirty-five schizophrenia patients. Secondly, phase-based coupling measures were used to generate the time-varying functional network for each subject. Finally, pre-stimulus network connections were iteratively modified according to different models of network reorganization. This adjustment was applied by minimizing the prediction error through recurrent iterations, following the predictive coding approach. Both controls and schizophrenia patients follow a reinforcement of the secondary neural pathways (i.e., pathways between cortical brain regions weakly connected during pre-stimulus) for most of the subjects, though the ratio of controls that exhibited this behavior was statistically significant higher than for patients. These findings suggest that schizophrenia is associated with an impaired ability to modify brain network configuration during cognition. Furthermore, we provide direct evidence that the changes in phase-based brain network parameters from pre-stimulus to cognitive response in the theta band are closely related to the performance in important cognitive domains. Our findings not only contribute to the understanding of healthy brain dynamics, but also shed light on the altered predictive neuronal substrates in schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2018.04.043

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCZ showed reduced theta-band power for predictable stimuli, regardless of their level of predictability.

    “SCZ also showed reduced theta-band power for predictable stimuli, regardless of their level of predictability (Gomez-Pilar et al., 2018).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Gomez-Pilar et al., 2018

    The Cognitive EEG Task section (p. 2) lists tones with different presentation probabilities but says only attended target tones were analyzed. The Results and Discussion (pp. 5–7) describe reduced changes in theta-band phase-based network measures in schizophrenia, not reduced theta-band power across levels of stimulus predictability. Searches for theta power and stimulus predictability found no passage establishing the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Clare, L., 1993. Memory in schizophrenia: what is impaired an what is perserved? Neuropsychologia 31, 1225 -1241. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1830257-3/rf0060)

Authors
Gomez-Pilar, J., Poza, J., Gómez, C., Northoff, G., Lubeiro, A., Cea-Cañas, B. B., Molina, V., & Hornero, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
201
Pages
120-129
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895776450
Cited by
32
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • FEDER (TEC2014-53196-R)
  • European Commission (POCTEP 0378_AD_EEGWA_2_P)
  • Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León (VA037U16)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS PI11/02203, PI15/00299)
  • Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (GRS 932/A/14, GRS 1134/A/15)
  • Clinical University Hospital of Valladolid
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, prestimulus EEG
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Neural Pathways, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review