Cited by 21Schizophrenia research and treatmentMachine Learning in HealthcarePsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Third external replication of an individualised transdiagnostic prediction model for the automatic detection of individuals at risk of psychosis using electronic health records

Open access
Puntis, Stephen, Oliver, Dominic, Fusar-Poli, Paolo·2021·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background Primary indicated prevention is a key target for reducing the incidence and burden of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. An individualised, clinically-based transdiagnostic model for the detection of individuals at risk of psychosis has been developed and validated in two large, urban healthcare providers. We tested its external validity in a geographically and demographically different non-urban population.Method Retrospective EHR cohort study. All individuals accessing secondary healthcare provided by Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust between 1st January 2011 and 30th November 2019 and receiving a primary index diagnosis of a non-psychotic or non-organic mental disorder were considered eligible. The previously developed model was applied to this database and its external prognostic accuracy was measured with Harrell's C.Findings The study included n = 33,710 eligible individuals, with an average age of 27.7 years (SD = 19.8), mostly white (92.0%) and female (57.3%). The mean follow-up was 1863.9 days (SD = 948.9), with 868 transitions to psychosis and a cumulative incidence of psychosis at 6 years of 2.9% (95%CI: 2.7-3.1). Compared to the urban development database, Oxford Health was characterised by a relevant case mix, lower incidence of psychosis, different distribution of baseline predictors, higher proportion of white females, and a lack of specialised clinical services for at risk individuals. Despite these differences the model retained an adequate prognostic performance (Harrell's C = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.78-0.81), with no major miscalibration.Interpretation The transdiagnostic, individualised, clinically-based risk calculator is transportable outside urban healthcare providers. Further research should test transportability of this risk prediction model in an international setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2021.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 21

Authors
Puntis, S., Oliver, D., & Fusar-Poli, P.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Puntis, Stephen
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
228
Pages
403-409
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121376542
Cited by
21
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
psychosis prediction, transdiagnostic model
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Risk Assessment, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review