Cited by 67Field-Flow Fractionation TechniquesChemical and Physical Properties of MaterialsProtein purification and stability

Density gradient ultracentrifugation for colloidal nanostructures separation and investigation

Li, Pengsong, Kumar, Anuj, Ma, Jun, Kuang, Yun, Luo, Liang, Sun, Xiaoming·2018·Science Bulletin

Abstract

In this article, we review the advancement in nanoseparation and concomitant purification of nanoparticles (NPs) by using density gradient ultracentrifugation technique (DGUC) and demonstrated by taking several typical examples. Study emphasizes the conceptual advances in classification, mechanism of DGUC and synthesis-structure-property relationships of NPs to provide the significant clue for the further synthesis optimization. Separation, concentration, and purification of NPs by DGUC can be achieved at the same time by introducing the water/oil interfaces into the separation chamber. We can develop an efficient method "lab in a tube" by introducing a reaction zone or an assembly zone in the gradient to find the surface reaction and assembly mechanism of NPs since the reaction time can be precisely controlled and the chemical environment change can be extremely fast. Finally, to achieve the best separation parameters for the colloidal systems, we gave the mathematical descriptions and computational optimized models as a new direction for making practicable and predictable DGUC separation method. Thus, it can be helpful for an efficient separation as well as for the synthesis optimization, assembly and surface reactions as a potential cornerstone for the future development in the nanotechnology and this review can be served as a plethora of advanced notes on the DGUC separation method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scib.2018.04.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 123 · Cited by 67

Authors
Li, P., Kumar, A., Ma, J., Kuang, Y., Luo, L., & Sun, X.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Luo, Liang
  • Sun, Xiaoming
Venue
Science Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
645-662
ISSN
2095-9273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801745524
Cited by
67
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • 中国科学通报:英文版 (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFF0204402)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
  • Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1205)
  • Ministry of Finance
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
density gradient ultracentrifugation, nanoparticle separation, nanoparticle purification, colloidal nanostructures, oil-water interface, nanoparticle assembly, surface reactions, synthesis-structure-property relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review