The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chlorophyll a fluorescence OJIP transient as a tool to characterize and evaluate response to heat and chilling stress in tomato leaf and fruit
Open accessAbstract
In tomato production, extreme temperatures such as heat and chilling are major factors limiting growth and productivity. Recently, the chlorophyll a fluorescence OJIP transient (OJIP transient) has been used as an effective tool for studying damage to and activity of the electron transport chain in the photosynthetic apparatus under various environmental stresses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the OJIP transient as a stress indicator and to characterize the effect of heat and chilling stress on the photosynthetic apparatus in tomato leaf and fruit. Detached leaves and fruits were incubated at 25 °C (control), 40 °C (heat stress), and 4 °C (chilling stress); OJIP transients were measured after exposure to stress for 1 h and 24 h, and several parameters were calculated according to the JIP-test. After exposure to stress for 1 h and 24 h, the OJIP curves and the JIP parameters clearly revealed differences between stress types and between tissue types. In addition, the JIP parameters and the energy pipeline model indicated that heat stress had a greater influence on the photosystem (PS) II electron transport chain than chilling stress, and that changes were greater in the fruit than in the leaf. Furthermore, the PS I electron transport chains of leaf and fruit appeared to be more heat resistant than those in PS II. Our results indicate that, in tomato leaf and fruit, OJIP transients and calculated JIP parameters can be used as sensitive methods for measuring the heat and chilling stress damage to the photosynthetic apparatus, and to identify the action sites of temperature stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants.
Allen, D. J., & Ort, D. R. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01808-2 · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
Microplastic Impacts on Microalgae Growth: Effects of Size and Humic Acid
Liu, G., Jiang, R., You, J., Muir, D. C. G., & Zeng, E. Y. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b06187 · Cited by 396
Pogrzeba, M., Rusinowski, S., Sitko, K., Krzyżak, J., Skalska, A., Małkowski, E., Ciszek, D., Werle, S., McCalmont, J. P., Mos, M., et al. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.058 · Cited by 78
Sustainable cultivation of microalgae by an insulated glazed glass plate photobioreactor
Vadiveloo, A., Moheimani, N. R., Alghamedi, R., Cosgrove, J. J., Alameh, K., & Parlevliet, D. (2016) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201500358 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zushi, K., Kajiwara, S., & Matsuzoe, N.
- Venue
- Scientia Horticulturae
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 148
- Pages
- 39-46
- ISSN
- 0304-4238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983801219
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.