Beetroot juice supplementation does not modify the 3-km running performance in untrained women
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An ergogenic effect of NO3− supplementation appears less likely in endurance-trained individuals.
“Although an ergogenic effect of NO3− supplementation appears less likely in endurance-trained individuals, i.e., [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74], recent systematic reviews support its efficacy as an ergogenic aid during continuous endurance-type exercise [75,76,77] and high-intensity intermittent-type exercise [78].”
From Effects of Dietary Nitrate Supplementation on Weightlifting Exercise Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Fernandes de Castro, T., de Assis Manoel, F., & Machado, F. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Machado, F.A.
- ORCID
- Machado, F.A.
- Venue
- Science & Sports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e167-e170
- ISSN
- 0765-1597 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790517828
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science & Sports (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- beetroot juice, nitrate supplementation, untrained women, acute supplementation, rating of perceived exertion, blood lactate, glycemic response, pacing strategy, endurance running
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
