Distribution and fate of perfluoroalkyl substances in Mediterranean Spanish sewage treatment plants
Open accessAbstract
The concentrations of 21 perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs: C4-C14, C16, C18 carboxylates, C4, C6-C8 and C10 sulfonates and C8 sulfonamide) were determined in influent, effluent and sludge from 16 different sewage treatment plants (STPs) located in the Ebro (6), Guadalquivir (5), Jucar (2) and Llobregat (3) Rivers, in two consecutive years (2010 and 2011). The analytes were extracted by solid phase extraction (SPE) and determined by Liquid Chromatography triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (LC-QqQ-MS). All samples, except two sludges from Guadalquivir River STPs, were contaminated with at least one PFAS. Perfluorobutanoate (PFBA), perfluoropentanoate (PFPeA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (L-PFOS) were the most frequently detected. The highest concentration in water was determined in 2010 in a Guadalquivir River STP (perfluorohexanoate, PFHxA: 5.60μgL(-1)) and, in 2011, in an Ebro River STP (perfluorobutane sulfonate, L-PFBS: 0.31μgL(-1)). In sludge samples, the maximum concentration in 2010 was 1.79μgg(-1)dry weight (dw) (L-PFOS, in a Llobregat River STP), and in 2011, 1.88μgg(-1)dw (PFBA, in one Guadalquivir River STP). High PFAS values in sludge could be related to positive removal efficiencies, and can be attributed to their adsorption. Distribution coefficients (Kd) were determined ranging between 0.32Lkg(-1) (perfluorohexane sulfonate, L-PFHxS) and 36.6 10(3)Lkg(-1) (PFBA). The total PFAS loads discharged into the basins showed high values for the Ebro River STPs (66.9gday(-1)) while in the others, the loads were between 3.97gday(-1), in the Jucar STPs, and 32.2gday(-1), in the Guadalquivir STPs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Campo, J., Masiá, A., Picó, Y., Farré, M., & Barceló, D.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de València (ES)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Universitat de Girona (ES)
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 472
- Pages
- 912-922
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055359344
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CSD-665-2009, CGL2011-29703-C02-02)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
- Keywords
- perfluorinated compounds, PFAS, wastewater treatment plants, sewage sludge, PFOS, perfluorobutanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid, PFBS, PFHxS, distribution coefficient, adsorption, river discharge, Mediterranean rivers, Ebro River, Guadalquivir River, Júcar River, Llobregat River
- MeSH terms
- Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Sewage, Spain, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review