Cited by 136Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Suitability of marginal biomass-derived biochars for soil amendment

Open access
Buss, Wolfram, Graham, Margaret C., Shepherd, Jessica G., Mašek, Ondřej·2016·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The term "marginal biomass" is used here to describe materials of little or no economic value, e.g. plants grown on contaminated land, food waste or demolition wood. In this study 10 marginal biomass-derived feedstocks were converted into 19 biochars at different highest treatment temperatures (HTT) using a continuous screw-pyrolysis unit. The aim was to investigate suitability of the resulting biochars for land application, judged on the basis of potentially toxic element (PTE) concentration, nutrient content and basic biochar properties (pH, EC, ash, fixed carbon). It was shown that under typical biochar production conditions the percentage content of several PTEs (As, Al, Zn) and nutrients (Ca, Mg) were reduced to some extent, but also that biochar can be contaminated by Cr and Ni during the pyrolysis process due to erosion of stainless steel reactor parts (average+82.8% Cr, +226.0% Ni). This can occur to such an extent that the resulting biochar is rendered unsuitable for soil application (maximum addition +22.5 mg Cr kg(-1) biochar and +44.4 mg Ni kg(-1) biochar). Biomass grown on land heavily contaminated with PTEs yielded biochars with PTE concentrations above recommended threshold values for soil amendments. Cd and Zn were of particular concern, exceeding the lowest threshold values by 31-fold and 7-fold respectively, despite some losses into the gas phase. However, thermal conversion of plants from less severely contaminated soils, demolition wood and food waste anaerobic digestate (AD) into biochar proved to be promising for land application. In particular, food waste AD biochar contained very high nutrient concentrations, making it interesting for use as fertiliser.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.148

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 136

Authors
Buss, W., Graham, M. C., Shepherd, J. G., & Mašek, O.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Mašek, Ondřej
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
547
Pages
314-322
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2232625605
Cited by
136
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Scottish Funding Council (HR08004)
  • Derek and Maureen Moss
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, soil amendment, potentially toxic elements, heavy metal contamination, pyrolysis, chromium, nickel, demolition wood, nutrient content, fertilizers
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Carbon, Charcoal, Fertilizers, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Temperature, Wood, Biomass, Environmental Restoration and Remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review