Cited by 40Heavy metals in environmentRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionHeavy Metals in Plants

Waste or substrate for metal hyperaccumulating plants — the potential of phytomining on waste incineration bottom ash

Rosenkranz, Theresa, Kisser, Johannes, Wenzel, Walter W., Puschenreiter, Markus·2017·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Phytomining could represent an innovative low-cost technology for the selective recovery of valuable trace elements from secondary resources. In this context the potential of phytomining from waste incineration bottom ash was tested in a pot experiment. Fresh bottom ash was acidified, leached to reduce salinity and amended with organic material to obtain a suitable substrate for plant growth. Two hyperaccumulator species, Alyssum serpyllifolium subsp. lusitanicum and Sedum plumbizincicola as well as three metal tolerant species, Brassica napus, B. juncea and Nicotiana tabacum were tested for their phytomining potential on the pre-treated and amended bottom ashes from municipal solid waste and hazardous waste incineration. The hyperaccumulators had severe difficulties to establish on the bottom ash and to produce sufficient biomass, likely due to salinity and Cu toxicity. Nevertheless, concentrations of Ni in A. serpyllifolium and Zn in S. plumbizincicola were high, but total metal removal was limited by the low biomass production and was clearly less than on metalliferous soils. The Brassica species proved to be more tolerant to salinity and high Cu concentrations and produced considerably higher biomass, but total metal removal was limited by rather low shoot concentrations. The observed limitations of the phytomining process along with currently low market prices of Ni and Zn suggest that further optimisation of the process is required in order to make phytomining economically feasible on the tested waste incineration bottom ashes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.144

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At present, proof of concept for metal recovery is well established for Ni; for other metals, it is either not thoroughly investigated or not economically feasible.

    “It is worth mentioning that at present, the proof of concept for metal recovery is well established for Ni; however, for other metals, it is either not thoroughly investigated or not economically feasible (Akinbile et al., 2021; Rosenkranz et al., 2017; Tognacchini et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenkranz, T., Kisser, J., Wenzel, W. W., & Puschenreiter, M.
Affiliations
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • alchemia-nova research and innovation gemeinnützige GmbH (AT)
Corresponding author
Rosenkranz, Theresa
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
575
Pages
910-918
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528622082
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (843643)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
Keywords
phytomining, metal hyperaccumulator plants, trace element recovery, nickel, zinc, copper toxicity, salinity, Alyssum serpyllifolium, Sedum plumbizincicola, Brassica napus, Brassica juncea, tobacco, hazardous waste incineration, municipal solid waste incineration, substrate amendment, secondary resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review