Waste or substrate for metal hyperaccumulating plants — the potential of phytomining on waste incineration bottom ash
Abstract
Phytomining could represent an innovative low-cost technology for the selective recovery of valuable trace elements from secondary resources. In this context the potential of phytomining from waste incineration bottom ash was tested in a pot experiment. Fresh bottom ash was acidified, leached to reduce salinity and amended with organic material to obtain a suitable substrate for plant growth. Two hyperaccumulator species, Alyssum serpyllifolium subsp. lusitanicum and Sedum plumbizincicola as well as three metal tolerant species, Brassica napus, B. juncea and Nicotiana tabacum were tested for their phytomining potential on the pre-treated and amended bottom ashes from municipal solid waste and hazardous waste incineration. The hyperaccumulators had severe difficulties to establish on the bottom ash and to produce sufficient biomass, likely due to salinity and Cu toxicity. Nevertheless, concentrations of Ni in A. serpyllifolium and Zn in S. plumbizincicola were high, but total metal removal was limited by the low biomass production and was clearly less than on metalliferous soils. The Brassica species proved to be more tolerant to salinity and high Cu concentrations and produced considerably higher biomass, but total metal removal was limited by rather low shoot concentrations. The observed limitations of the phytomining process along with currently low market prices of Ni and Zn suggest that further optimisation of the process is required in order to make phytomining economically feasible on the tested waste incineration bottom ashes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At present, proof of concept for metal recovery is well established for Ni; for other metals, it is either not thoroughly investigated or not economically feasible.
“It is worth mentioning that at present, the proof of concept for metal recovery is well established for Ni; however, for other metals, it is either not thoroughly investigated or not economically feasible (Akinbile et al., 2021; Rosenkranz et al., 2017; Tognacchini et al., 2020).”
From Sustainability of phytoremediation: Post-harvest stratagems and economic opportunities for the produced metals contaminated biomass (2023) · cites this paper as Rosenkranz et al., 2017
Cites
<i>Sebertia acuminata</i> : A Hyperaccumulator of Nickel from New Caledonia
Jaffré, T., Brooks, R. R., Lee, J., & Reeves, R. D. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.193.4253.579 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Improving the Agronomy of<i>Alyssum murale</i>for Extensive Phytomining: A Five-Year Field Study
Bani, A., Echevarria, G., Sulçe, S., & Morel, J. L. (2015) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2013.862204 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khan, A. H. A., Kiyani, A., Santiago-Herrera, M., Ibáñez, J., Yousaf, S., Iqbal, M., Martel-Martín, S., & Barros, R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116700 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosenkranz, T., Kisser, J., Wenzel, W. W., & Puschenreiter, M.
- Affiliations
- BOKU University (AT)
- alchemia-nova research and innovation gemeinnützige GmbH (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenkranz, Theresa
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 575
- Pages
- 910-918
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2528622082
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (843643)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
- Keywords
- phytomining, metal hyperaccumulator plants, trace element recovery, nickel, zinc, copper toxicity, salinity, Alyssum serpyllifolium, Sedum plumbizincicola, Brassica napus, Brassica juncea, tobacco, hazardous waste incineration, municipal solid waste incineration, substrate amendment, secondary resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review