The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk assessment and source analysis of soil heavy metal pollution from lower reaches of Yellow River irrigation in China
Abstract
The level of concentration of heavy metal in soil is detrimental to soil quality. The Heigangkou-Liuyuankou irrigation area in the lower-reach of Yellow River irrigation, as home to a large population and a major site to agricultural production, is vulnerable to heavy metal pollution. This study examined soil quality in Heigangkou-Liuyuankou irrigation areas of Kaifeng, China. Pollution in soil and potential risks introduced by heavy metal accumulation were assessed using Nemerow, Geoaccumulation, and Hakanson's ecological risk indices. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used to model and present the spatiotemporal changes of the pollution sources and factors affecting the levels of pollution. The heavy metals found in the sampled soil are Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, As, and Hg. Among them, Cd is more concentrated than the others. The southwestern region of the studied area confronts the most serious heavy metal pollution. There exist spatial disparities of low concentrations of different heavy metals in the study area. Hg and Cd are found to pose the highest potential ecological risks. However, their risk levels are not the same across the study area. Levels concentration of Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, As, and Hg in soil are highly correlated. In combination, they post an additional threat to the ecological environment. Transportation, rural settlements, and water bodies are found to be the major sources of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Hg pollution in the soil; among the major sources, transportation is the most significant factor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Broeg, K., & Lehtonen, K. K. (2006) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.02.004 · Cited by 315
Cited by
Xiang, M., Li, Y., Yang, J., Lei, K., Li, Y., Li, F., Zheng, D., Fang, X., & Cao, Y. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116911 · Cited by 469
Self-citationYuan, X., Xue, N., & Han, Z. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2020.08.013 · Cited by 401
Heavy metals pollution from smelting activities: A threat to soil and groundwater
Adnan, M., Xiao, B., Ali, M. U., Xiao, P., Zhao, P., Wang, H., & Bibi, S. (2024) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116189 · Cited by 312
Duan, H., Wang, Y., Shen, H., Ren, C., Li, J., Li, J., Wang, Y., & Su, Y. (2024) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-024-02236-4 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, P., Qin, C., Hong, X., Kang, G., Qin, M., Yang, D., Pang, B., Li, Y., He, J., & Dick, R. P.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 633
- Pages
- 1136-1147
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794800342
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk assessment and source analysis of soil heavy metal pollution from lower reaches of Yellow River irrigation in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.228
- The paper
- Zhang, P., Qin, C., Hong, X., Kang, G., Qin, M., Yang, D., Pang, B., Li, Y., He, J., & Dick, R. P. (2018). Risk assessment and source analysis of soil heavy metal pollution from lower reaches of Yellow River irrigation in China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.