Cited by 729Climate change impacts on agricultureHydrology and Drought AnalysisAgricultural risk and resilience

Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future

Open access
Leng, Guoyong, Hall, Jim·2019·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Understanding the potential drought impacts on agricultural production is critical for ensuring global food security. Instead of providing a deterministic estimate, this study investigates the likelihood of yield loss of wheat, maize, rice and soybeans in response to droughts of various intensities in the 10 largest producing countries. We use crop-country specific standardized precipitation index (SPI) and census yield data for 1961–2016 to build a probabilistic modeling framework for estimating yield loss risk under a moderate (−1.2 < SPI < −0.8), severe (−1.5 < SPI < −1.3), extreme (−1.9 < SPI < −1.6) and exceptional (SPI < −2.0) drought. Results show that there is >80% probability that wheat production will fall below its long-term average when experiencing an exceptional drought, especially in USA and Canada. As for maize, India shows the highest risk of yield reduction under droughts, while rice is the crop that is most vulnerable to droughts in Vietnam and Thailand. Risk of drought-driven soybean yield loss is the highest in USA, Russian and India. Yield loss risk tends to grow faster when experiencing a shift in drought severity from moderate to severe than that from extreme to the exceptional category, demonstrating the non-linear response of yield to the increase in drought severity. Sensitivity analysis shows that temperature plays an important role in determining drought impacts, through reducing or amplifying drought-driven yield loss risk. Compared to present conditions, an ensemble of 11 crop models simulated an increase in yield loss risk by 9%–12%, 5.6%–6.3%, 18.1%–19.4% and 15.1%–16.1 for wheat, maize, rice and soybeans by the end of 21st century, respectively, without considering the benefits of CO 2 fertilization and adaptations. This study highlights the non-linear response of yield loss risk to the increase in drought severity. This implies that adaptations should be more targeted, considering not only the crop type and region but also the specific drought severity of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.434

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water is a major resource that determines the productivity of all agricultural systems, including maize in the U.S. corn-belt.

    “Water is a major resource that determines the productivity of all agricultural systems, including maize in the U.S. corn-belt”

    From Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity (2020) · cites this paper as Leng & Hall, 2019

    The Introduction describes drought as a major constraint on crop yields, and the Results report an association between drought and reduced yields for the four crops studied, including maize. The paper does not establish that water determines productivity in all agricultural systems, and its specific U.S. maize example concerns the Great Plains rather than the Corn Belt. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Haddeland I. Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 9 2014 3251 3256 24344275 PMC3948259
  2. Heim R.R. Jr. A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83 8 2002 1149
  3. Huang S. The asymmetric impact of global warming on US drought types and distributions in a large ensemble of 97 hydro-climatic simulations Sci. Rep. 7 1 2017 5891 28724987 PMC5517487
  4. Leng G. Evidence for a weakening strength of temperature-corn yield relation in the United States during 1980–2010 Sci. Total Environ. 605 2017 551 558 28672243
  5. Leng G. Recent changes in county-level corn yield variability in the United States from observations and crop models Sci. Total Environ. 607 2017 683 690 28710999
  6. Lobell D.B. Schlenker W. Costa-Roberts J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980 Science 333 6042 2011 616 620 21551030
  7. Lobell D.B. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the US Midwest Science 344 6183 2014 516 519 24786079
  8. Matiu M. Ankerst D.P. Menzel A. Interactions between temperature and drought in global and regional crop yield variability during 1961–2014 PLoS One 12 5 2017 e0178339 PMC5446168 28552938
  9. McKee T.B. Doesken N.J. Kleist J. The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales, Paper Presented at Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology 1993 American Meteorological Society Boston MA
  10. Mishra A.K. Singh V.P. A review of drought concepts J. Hydrol. 391 1 2010 202 216
  11. Müller C. Global patterns of crop yield stability under additional nutrient and water inputs PLoS One 13 6 2018 e0198748 PMC6021068 29949598
  12. Nelsen R.B. An Introduction to Copulas 2007 Springer Science & Business Media
  13. Qin W. Hu C. Oenema O. Soil mulching significantly enhances yields and water and nitrogen use efficiencies of maize and wheat: a meta-analysis Sci. Rep. 5 2015 16210 26586114 PMC4653642
  14. Rosenzweig C. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 9 2014 3268 3273 24344314 PMC3948251
  15. Schewe J. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 9 2014 3245 3250 24344289 PMC3948304
  16. Tilman D. Balzer C. Hill J. Befort B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 50 2011 20260 20264 22106295 PMC3250154
  17. Warszawski L. Frieler K. Huber V. Piontek F. Serdeczny O. Schewe J. The inter-sectoral impact model intercomparison project (ISI–MIP): project framework Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 9 2014 3228 3232 24344316 PMC3948262

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leng, G., & Hall, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Leng, Guoyong
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
654
Pages
811-821
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899848994
Cited by
729
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2
FWCI
34.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (205212/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
Keywords
wheat, maize, rice, soybean, drought severity, Standardized Precipitation Index, food security, temperature effects on drought, agricultural adaptation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Models, Theoretical, Temperature, Crops, Agricultural, Droughts, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review