The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability
Open accessAbstract
The United States like every other country across the globe, especially the developed nations, have consistently battled one of man's greatest challenge of the 21st century-saving and sustaining the dire environment. Being the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2) after China, the United States is increasingly faced with an urgent policy drive toward environmental sustainability. Against the backdrop, this study employed the dynamic ARDL-bound testing approach to observing the tripartite impact of the trade policy, monetary policy, and migration index on carbon emissions over the period 1990:Q1-2018: Q2. The incorporated renewable energy consumption and the real GDP which controls for other unobserved factors are observed to have similar and significant impacts as in previous studies. The current study found that the trade policy, monetary policy, and migration index exerts positive and significant impacts on carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run. It implies that in the near future, the environmental sustainability of the United States is at the risk of the government policies on trade, monetary, and migration. However, such impact of the migration index on the carbon dioxide emissions is barely significant in the long-run and at the immediate time. Although the impact of the government's trade policy on carbon dioxide emissions is significant in the long-run, it immediate impact is negative and not significant. Hence, policy frameworks of the government should be designed such that it meets the Sustainable Development Goals 2030.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.616 · Cited by 20,385
Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y · Cited by 12,633
Cited by
Udemba, E. N. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12678-3 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Alola, A. A.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 658
- Pages
- 260-267
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2905562910
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212
- The paper
- Alola, A. A. (2019). The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.