Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large scale prediction of groundwater nitrate concentrations from spatial data using machine learning

Knoll, Lukas, Breuer, Lutz, Bach, Martin·2019·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Reducing nitrogen inputs, in particular nitrate, to groundwater is becoming increasingly important to fulfil requirements of the European Water Framework Directive. When developing management plans for mitigation measures at larger scales, complex hydro-biogeochemical models reach their limits due to data availability and spatial discretization. To circumvent this problem, the spatial distribution of nitrate concentration in groundwater is estimated using a parsimonious GIS-based statistical approach. Point nitrate concentrations and spatial environmental data as predictors are used to train statistical models. In order to compile the spatial predictors with the respective monitoring sites, different designs of contributing areas (buffer zones) and their effects on the performance of different statistical models are investigated. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Random Forest (RF) and Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) are compared in terms of the predictive performance of each model according to various objective functions. We determine the most influential spatial predictors used in the respective models. After training the models with a subset of the data, we then predict the spatial nitrate distribution in groundwater for the entire federal state of Hesse, Germany on a 1 × 1 km grid by only the spatial environmental data. The Random Forest model outperforms the other models (R2 = 0.54), relying on hydrogeological units, the percentage of arable land and the nitrogen balance as the three most influencing predictors based on a 1000 m circular contributing area. The use of exclusively spatial available predictors is a big step forward in the prediction of nitrate in groundwater on regional scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.045

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

  • A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence

    Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271

  • Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production

    Khanna, M., Chen, L., Basso, B., Cai, X., Field, J. L., Guan, K., Jiang, C., Lark, T. J., Richard, T. L., Spawn‐Lee, S. A., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12877 · Cited by 105

    “…models such as DNDC, SWAT, and AgroIBIS (Brandes et al., 2018; Ferin et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2012) and various statistical and machine learning approaches (Fezzi et al., 2015; Knoll et al., 2019; Paudel & Crago, 2021) are used to simulate responses to management at watershed and basin scales.”
    Method

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Knoll, L., Breuer, L., & Bach, M.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
668
Pages
1317-1327
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922051790
Cited by
265
References
46
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large scale prediction of groundwater nitrate concentrations from spatial data using machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.045
The paper
Knoll, L., Breuer, L., & Bach, M. (2019). Large scale prediction of groundwater nitrate concentrations from spatial data using machine learning. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.045

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.