The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: Evidence from G20 countries
Abstract
Agriculture is the world's second largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitter due to the use of fossil fuel-based fertilizers, agricultural machinery, and the burning of biomass. Meanwhile, the Group of Twenty (G20) countries, which include the world's top three agricultural markets, have a significant impact on world agricultural development. This study is the first attempt to examine the effects of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions within the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in a panel of 19 nations of the G20 countries from 1990 to 2014. To do so, panel data unit root tests, cointegration tests, and the panel fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) estimator are used. The main findings are as follows: (1) Panel data unit root and cointegration tests confirm the existence of a long-run relationship among the selected variables, (2) agriculture significantly increases CO2 emissions in the full sample and the developing economies of the G20, while renewable energy consumption reduces the CO2 emissions in the full sample and the developed economies of the G20, (3) the EKC indeed exists in the full sample and developed economies, while economic growth only exerts a positive impact on CO2 emissions for developing economies, indicating that the peak of CO2 emissions for developing economies has not yet been reached, and (4) varied causality links exist among the variables across the different income levels of the G20 countries. Based on the above findings, to suppress the greenhouse effect, the G20 countries' policymakers should not only promote the development of sustainable agriculture, but also stimulate renewable energy consumption, especially in developing economies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for a unit root in time series regression
PHILLIPS, P. C. B., & PERRON, P. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.335 · Cited by 19,155
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3914 · Cited by 7,595
A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631 · Cited by 7,460
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18307 · Cited by 3,637
96/01121 BP statistical review of world energy 1995
(1996) · Fuel and Energy Abstracts · doi:10.1016/0140-6701(96)91019-x · Cited by 2,663
Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., & Bulut, Ü. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080 · Cited by 1,138
CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey
Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005 · Cited by 1,128
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064 · Cited by 1,127
Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065 · Cited by 792
Cited by
Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2020) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.020 · Cited by 1,135
Jaiswal, K. K., Chowdhury, C. R., Yadav, D., Verma, R., Dutta, S., Jaiswal, K. S., SangmeshB, & Karuppasamy, K. S. K. (2022) · Energy Nexus · doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100118 · Cited by 770
Adams, S., Adedoyin, F., Olaniran, E., & Bekun, F. V. (2020) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.012 · Cited by 391
Ridzuan, N. H. A. M., Marwan, N. F., Khalid, N., Ali, M. H., & Tseng, M.-L. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104879 · Cited by 316
Mikulčić, H., Ridjan Skov, I., Dominković, D. F., Wan Alwi, S. R., Manan, Z. A., Tan, R., Duić, N., Hidayah Mohamad, S. N., & Wang, X. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109338 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiao, H., Zheng, F., Jiang, H., & Dong, K.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 671
- Pages
- 722-731
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2925161719
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 58.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: Evidence from G20 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.336
- The paper
- Qiao, H., Zheng, F., Jiang, H., & Dong, K. (2019). The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: Evidence from G20 countries. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.