The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects
Open accessAbstract
In order to address the ever-increasing problem of the world's population food needs, the optimization of farming crops yield, the combat of iron deficiency in plants (chlorosis) and the elimination/reduction of crop pathogens are of key challenges to solve. Traditional ways of solving these problems are either unpractical on a large scale (e.g. use of manure) or are not environmental friendly (e.g. application of iron-synthetic fertilizers or indiscriminate use of pesticides). Therefore, the search for greener substitutes, such as the application of siderophores of bacterial source or the use of plant-growth promoting bacteria (PGPB), is presented as a very promising alternative to enhance yield of crops and performance. However, the use of microorganisms is not a risk-free solution and the potential biohazards associated with the utilization of bacteria in agriculture should be considered. The present work gives a current overview of the main mechanisms associated with the use of bacteria in the promotion of plant growth. The potentiality of several bacterial genera (Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Bacillus, Pantoea, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium) regarding to siderophore production capacity and other plant growth-promoting properties are presented. In addition, the field performance of these bacteria genera as well as the biosafety aspects related with their use for agricultural proposes are reviewed and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Chemistry and biology of siderophores
Hider, R. C., & Kong, X. (2010) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b906679a · Cited by 1,722
Cited by
Xiang, L., Harindintwali, J. D., Wang, F., Redmile-Gordon, M., Chang, S. X., Fu, Y., He, C., Muhoza, B., Brahushi, F., Bolan, N., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c02976 · Cited by 450
Koza, N., Adedayo, A., Babalola, O., & Kappo, A. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10081528 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferreira, C. M. H., Soares, H. M. V. M., & Soares, E. V.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 682
- Pages
- 779-799
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2940119228
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.225
- The paper
- Ferreira, C. M. H., Soares, H. M. V. M., & Soares, E. V. (2019). Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.