Cited by 85Water Resource Management and QualityChild Nutrition and Water AccessWater Governance and Infrastructure

Leaving no one behind: Evaluating access to water, sanitation and hygiene for vulnerable and marginalized groups

Open access
Ezbakhe, F., Giné-Garriga, R., Pérez-Foguet, A.·2019·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Achieving equitable access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services requires paying special attention to the most disadvantaged segments of the population. Yet, despite all the progress made to evaluate the access of vulnerable and marginalized groups, important knowledge gaps still remain with respect to identifying their specific barriers and needs. At the global level, for example, the two monitoring mechanisms for SDG 6 - the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) and Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and drinking-water (GLAAS) - face difficulties in understanding how, and to what extent, vulnerable and marginalized groups access WASH services. In this context, this work examines the UNECE/WHO-Europe 'Equitable Access Score-card' for assessing the access to WASH services by vulnerable and marginalized groups. In particular, we: (i) analyse its strengths and limitations as a tool for revealing the needs of these groups in accessing WASH services; and (ii) propose an extended variant of the score-card that addresses these limitations. We test this version in two local-level case studies: Lima (Peru) and Castelló de la Plana (Spain). The score-card diagnosis is found to be particularly useful for collecting information on the level of access of the different vulnerable and marginalized groups, as well as the specific public policies and funding mechanisms in place that address and support their needs. However, the score-card should be complemented with specific…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 85

Authors
Ezbakhe, F., Giné-Garriga, R., & Pérez-Foguet, A.
Affiliations
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Corresponding author
Ezbakhe, F.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
683
Pages
537-546
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946053066
Cited by
85
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Agencia Española de Cooperación International para el Desarrollo (BOE-A-2015-1037)
  • UPC's Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament (CCD-2016-U013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
Keywords
water, sanitation and hygiene, vulnerable and marginalized groups, Joint Monitoring Programme, human rights to water and sanitation, Lima, Castellón
MeSH terms
Humans, Human Rights, Hygiene, Poverty, Sanitation, Socioeconomic Factors, Water Supply, Drinking Water, Water Resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review