The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial assessment of farmland soil pollution and its potential human health risks in China
Abstract
Soil pollution severely threatens agro-ecosystem stability. It is important to accurately understand the status of farmland pollution in order to protect national food safety and human health. However, information of the combined pollution level of Chinese farmland soil and associated human health risk at the national scale is relatively lacking. In this study, 5597 samples from 1781 farmland soil sites were obtained from 553 reports and combined into pollution databases of heavy metals, organochlorines, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Based on the data obtained, this paper demonstrated the current pollution status of farmland soil, and assessed the subsequent human health risk. Results showed that the combined pollution ratio of Chinese farmland soil was 22.10%, with 1.23% of severe pollution level. Moreover, the total non-carcinogenic hazard quotients of farmland soil pollution were within the safety threshold for adults, but there was a slight non-carcinogenic risk for children. For adults, the ratio of total farmland area to total carcinogenic risk quotients above the safety threshold of 1 × 10-5 was only 1.02%, but for children, the ratio was as high as 20.75%. On the other side, food crop and vegetable plantations were the priority control farmland soil compared to other types. Meanwhile, Yunnan, Hunan, Anhui, Henan, and Liaoning were selected as the priority control provinces due to their severe pollutions and high human health risks. This study has provided a comprehensive pollution and health risk assessment. Furthermore, the spatial distribution might provide as the scientific support for accelerating the mapping of soil pollution in China, as well as developing the policy for the contaminated farmland soil management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil pollution — speed up global mapping
Hou, D., & Ok, Y. S. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00669-x · Cited by 44
Cited by
Yuan, X., Xue, N., & Han, Z. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2020.08.013 · Cited by 401
Wang, C., Jiang, Y., Shao, Y., Chen, Z., Gao, Y., Liang, J., Gao, J., Fang, F., & Guo, J. (2024) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105130 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, S., Ma, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, G.-J., & Chen, F.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 687
- Pages
- 642-653
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951523679
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial assessment of farmland soil pollution and its potential human health risks in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.291
- The paper
- Zeng, S., Ma, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, G.-J., & Chen, F. (2019). Spatial assessment of farmland soil pollution and its potential human health risks in China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.