The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotic microbial resistance (AMR) removal efficiencies by conventional and advanced wastewater treatment processes: A review
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified the spread of antibiotic resistance as one of the major risks to global public health. An important transfer route into the aquatic environment is the urban water cycle. In this paper the occurrence and transport of antibiotic microbial resistance in the urban water cycle are critically reviewed. The presence of antibiotic resistance in low impacted surface water is being discussed to determine background antibiotic resistance levels, which might serve as a reference for treatment targets in the absence of health-based threshold levels. Different biological, physical and disinfection/oxidation processes employed in wastewater treatment and their efficacy regarding their removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance geness (ARGs) were evaluated. A more efficient removal of antibiotic microbial resistance abundances from wastewater effluents can be achieved by advanced treatment processes, including membrane filtration, ozonation, UV-irradiation or chlorination, to levels typically observed in urban surface water or low impacted surface water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015
Klein, E. Y., Van Boeckel, T. P., Martinez, E. M., Pant, S., Gandra, S., Levin, S. A., Goossens, H., & Laxminarayan, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717295115 · Cited by 3,232
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
Rizzo, L., Manaia, C., Merlin, C., Schwartz, T., Dagot, C., Ploy, M. C., Michael, I., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032 · Cited by 2,493
Self-citationKoch, G., Yepes, A., Förstner, K. U., Wermser, C., Stengel, S. T., Modamio, J., Ohlsen, K., Foster, K. R., & Lopez, D. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.046 · Cited by 211
Cited by
Wang, J., Chu, L., Wojnárovits, L., & Takács, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140997 · Cited by 895
Nguyen, A. Q., Vu, H. P., Nguyen, L. N., Wang, Q., Djordjevic, S. P., Donner, E., Yin, H., & Nghiem, L. D. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146964 · Cited by 339
Manikandan, S., Subbaiya, R., Saravanan, M., Ponraj, M., Selvam, M., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132867 · Cited by 268
Li, S., Zhang, C., Li, F., Hua, T., Zhou, Q., & Ho, S.-H. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125148 · Cited by 267
Mary Ealias, A., Meda, G., & Tanzil, K. (2024) · Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s44169-024-00067-z · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Hiller, C. X., Hübner, U., Fajnorova, S., Schwartz, T., & Drewes, J. E.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 685
- Pages
- 596-608
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945526031
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotic microbial resistance (AMR) removal efficiencies by conventional and advanced wastewater treatment processes: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.315
- The paper
- Hiller, C. X., Hübner, U., Fajnorova, S., Schwartz, T., & Drewes, J. E. (2019). Antibiotic microbial resistance (AMR) removal efficiencies by conventional and advanced wastewater treatment processes: A review. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
