The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural or Synthetic—How Global Trends in Textile Usage Threaten Freshwater Environments
Open accessAbstract
As the global demand for textiles increases, so to do the potential environmental impacts that stem from their production, use and disposal. Freshwater ecosystems are particularly at risk: rivers often act as the primary recipients of waste generated during the production of textiles and are subject to pollutants released during the broader lifecycle of a textile product. Here, we investigate how global technological and societal processes shape the way we produce, use and dispose of textiles, and what this means for the environmental quality and ecological health of freshwaters. We examine two predominant 'natural' and synthetic textiles (wool and Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), respectively), and find that risks to freshwater ecosystems vary throughout the lifecycle of these textiles; and across geographies, in-line with regulatory and economic landscapes. Woollen textiles pose most risk during the Production Phase, while PET textiles pose most risk during the Use and Disposal Phases. Our findings show that: (i) both 'natural' and synthetic textiles present substantial challenges for freshwater environments; and (ii) bespoke solutions are needed in areas of the world where the global division of labour and less stringent environmental regulations have concentrated textile production; but also in regions where high textile consumption combines with unsustainable disposal behaviours. Effective mitigation may combine technological advances with societal changes in market mechanisms, regulations, textile use and disposal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the degradation of natural and semisynthetic fibers causes the release of toxics adsorbed (i.e., textile dyes) to the surface into the environment [90,91].”
From Is Wild Marine Biota Affected by Microplastics? (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microplastics in the marine environment
Andrady, A. L. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 · Cited by 8,105
Napper, I. E., & Thompson, R. C. (2016) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025 · Cited by 1,799
Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web
Setälä, O., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., & Lehtiniemi, M. (2014) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.013 · Cited by 1,635
Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent
Mason, S. A., Garneau, D. E., Sutton, R., Chu, Y., Ehmann, K., Barnes, J. P., Fink, P., Papazissimos, D., & Rogers, D. L. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.056 · Cited by 1,179
Soares, A., Guieysse, B., Jefferson, B., Cartmell, E., & Lester, J. N. (2008) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.01.004 · Cited by 1,174
Wang, W., Ndungu, A. W., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.213 · Cited by 1,132
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087 · cited 1×
“As the demand for clothing increases alongside population growth, so do the environmental impacts that stem from the manufacture, usage and disposal of textiles (Sandin and Peters, 2018).”
BackgroundMicroplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms
Wright, S. L., Rowe, D., Thompson, R. C., & Galloway, T. S. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.068 · Cited by 1,079
Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill
Dawson, A. L., Kawaguchi, S., King, C. K., Townsend, K. A., King, R., Huston, W. M., & Bengtson Nash, S. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03465-9 · Cited by 1,023
Horton, A. A., Svendsen, C., Williams, R. J., Spurgeon, D. J., & Lahive, E. (2016) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.004 · Cited by 1,000
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Chao, 1981, Biological treatment of wool scouring wastewater, J. Water Pollut. Cont. Fed., 53, 311
- Duffield, P.A., Wimbush, J.M., Demot, P.F.A., 1990. Wool dyeing with environmentally acceptable levels of chromium in effluent. In: Crawshaw, G.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th International Wool Textile Research Conference. Christchurch, New Zealand.
- Hassaan, 2017, Health and environmental hazards of synthetic dyes, Am. J. Environ. Sci. Eng., 1, 64
- Kumar, 2018, Eco-friendly dyes and dyeing, Adv. Mater. Technol. Environ. Appl., 2, 145
- Moses, 2006, Growth of textile industry and their issues on environment with reference to wool industry, Asian Dyer, 3, 61
- Samchetshabam, 2017, Impact of textile dyes waste on aquatic environments and its treatment, Environ. Ecol., 35, 2349
- Udakhe, 2011, Recent advances in shrinkproofing of wool, Journal of the Textile Association, 72, 171
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microplastics as an Emerging Threat to the Global Environment and Human Health
Ghosh, S., Sinha, J. K., Ghosh, S. K., Vashisth, K., Han, S. S., & Bhaskar, R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151410821 · Cited by 493
Palacios-Mateo, C., van der Meer, Y., & Seide, G. H. (2021) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-020-00447-x · Cited by 283
Patti, A., Cicala, G., & Acierno, D. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13010134 · Cited by 241
Possibility Routes for Textile Recycling Technology
Damayanti, D., Wulandari, L. A., Bagaskoro, A., Rianjanu, A., & Wu, H. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13213834 · Cited by 214
Baho, D. L., Bundschuh, M., & Futter, M. N. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15724 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, C., Windsor, F. M., Munday, M., & Durance, I.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Durance, Isabelle
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 718
- Pages
- 134689
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990757608
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (1642617, NE/L002434/, L002434)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- textile industry, freshwater ecosystems, wool, polyethylene terephthalate, synthetic textiles, natural textiles, textile waste, environmental risk assessment, life cycle assessment, environmental regulation, international division of labor, river pollution, sustainable consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
