Biochar-induced migration of tetracycline and the alteration of microbial community in agricultural soils
Abstract
Recently, biochar is widely used as a soil amendment to improve soil properties, which might affect the fate and behavior of contaminants in soil. In this study, we investigated the effect of biochar on the migration of tetracycline (TC) in soil and their combined impacts on microbiome. Due to the strong interaction between soil and TC, adsorption, rather than photolysis or biodegradation, was the dominating dissipation way of TC in soil. Moreover, biochar could promote the vertical migration of TC through the decreased soil bulk density and its lower adsorption capacity. After 90-day incubation, only slight impact of TC on soil bacterial community was observed due to the rapid dissipation of TC in soil, whereas more available C supply induced by biochar significantly altered bacterial community via the enhancement of copiotrophic bacteria. Besides, biochar could decrease the soil pH and thus change the composition of fungal community. The effect of TC on fungal community was partially counteracted by biochar, which could adsorb part of TC and thus decrease the contact of TC with microorganisms. This work will improve our understanding of the fate of organic pollutants and evolution of microbiome in soil where biochar servers as soil amendment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Introduction of biochar can increase carbon supply and change bacterial community by enhancing copiotrophic bacteria.
“Furthermore, the introduction of BC can increase the carbon supply and change the bacterial community by enhancing copiotrophic bacteria (Liu etal. 2020).”
From Review of organic and inorganic pollutants removal by biochar and biochar-based composites (2021) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2020)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Liu, H.-Y., Song, C., Zhao, S., & Wang, S.-G.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Song, Chao
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 706
- Pages
- 136086
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2994722111
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- biochar, tetracycline, soil sorption, soil microbial communities, soil bacterial communities, soil fungal communities, soil amendment, soil bulk density, copiotrophic bacteria, soil pH, agricultural soils
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Charcoal, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review