Cited by 454Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Evaluation of change in biochar properties derived from different feedstock and pyrolysis temperature for environmental and agricultural application

Pariyar, Priya, Kumari, Kanchan, Jain, Manish Kumar, Jadhao, Pradip S.·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

In recent years, the application of biochar has increased significantly for sustainable and efficient carbon sequestration, improving soil quality and enhancement of plant growth. The biochar is mostly made from agricultural residues and waste materials. The objective of this study was to assess the changes in physicochemical, surface morphology, and mineral composition of different biochars with varying pyrolysis temperature. Eighteen different types of biochars were prepared through pyrolysis of feedstock at four different temperatures (350 °C, 450 °C, 550 °C and 650 °C). The feedstock used for the preparation of biochar were organic waste materials such as pine saw dust, rice husk, food waste, poultry litter and paper sludge. Pyrolysis temperatures and feedstock types significantly influenced biochar properties. For instance, pH of poultry litter and paper sludge biochar has increased from 6.2 to 10.3, BET surface area of saw dust and rice husk increased from 3.39 to 443.79 m 2 g - 1 and 11.61 to 280.97 m 2 g - 1 while cation exchange capacity value decreased with the increase in temperature. Paper sludge and poultry litter had the highest ash content value (57.20 ± 0.02 and 44.10 ± 0.02) whereas saw dust, rice husk and food waste biochar have highest fixed carbon value (55.31 ± 0.15, 48.47 ± 0.31 and 58.85 ± 0.22) at 650 °C. Degree of aromaticity increased and polarity reduced significantly with pyrolysis temperature. Rice husk and saw dust biochar prepared at higher temp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136433

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 97 · Cited by 454

Authors
Pariyar, P., Kumari, K., Jain, M. K., & Jadhao, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
  • National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumari, Kanchan
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
713
Pages
136433
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000215085
Cited by
454
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 38
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
  • Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad
  • Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
biochar, pyrolysis temperature, feedstock, pine sawdust, rice husk, food waste, poultry litter, paper mill sludge, physicochemical properties, surface area, cation exchange capacity, ash content, aromaticity, mineral composition, carbon sequestration, soil amendment, agricultural waste
MeSH terms
Pyrolysis, Animals, Charcoal, Refuse Disposal, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review