Estimating resilience of crop production systems: From theory to practice
Open accessAbstract
Agricultural production systems are sensitive to weather and climate anomalies and extremes as well as to other environmental and socio-economic adverse events. An adequate evaluation of the resilience of such systems helps to assess food security and the capacity of society to cope with the effects of global warming and the associated increase of climate extremes. Here, we propose and apply a simple indicator of resilience of annual crop production that can be estimated from crop production time series. First, we address the problem of quantifying resilience in a simplified theoretical framework, focusing on annual crops. This results in the proposal of an indicator, measured by the reciprocal of the squared coefficient of variance, which is proportional to the return period of the largest shocks that the crop production system can absorb, and which is consistent with the original ecological definition of resilience. Subsequently, we show the sensitivity of the crop resilience indicator to the level of management of the crop production system, to the frequency of extreme events as well as to simplified socio-economic impacts of the production losses. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the indicator using historical production data at national and sub-national levels for France. The results show that the value of the resilience indicator steeply increases with crop diversity until six crops are considered, and then levels off. The effect of diversity on production resilience is highest when crops are more diverse (i.e. as reflected in less well correlated production time series). In the case of France, the indicator reaches about 60% of the value that would be expected if all crop production time-series were uncorrelated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zampieri et al. (2020) found that at country-level scale (France), production resilience increased with crop diversity but levelled-off at six crops.
“Zampieri et al. (2020) found that at country-level scale (France), production resilience increased with crop diversity but levelled-off at six crops.”
From Performance of innovative cropping systems diversified with oilseeds and protein crops: identification and resolution of methodological issues, using the Syppre experimental network as a case study (2024) · cites this paper as Zampieri et al. (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 113
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Macholdt J. Piepho H.-P. Honermeier B. Mineral NPK and manure fertilisation affecting the yield stability of winter wheat: results from a long-term field experiment Eur. J. Agron. 102 2019 14 22 10.1016/j.eja.2018.10.007 · DOI
- Yang L.-N. Pan Z.-C. Zhu W. Wu E.-J. He D.-C. Yuan X. Qin Y.-Y. Wang Y. Chen R.-S. Thrall P.H. Burdon J.J. Shang L.-P. Sui Q.-J. Zhan J. Enhanced agricultural sustainability through within-species diversification Nat. Sustain. 2 2019 46 52 10.1038/s41893-018-0201-2 · DOI
- Zampieri Matteo Ceglar A. Dentener F. Toreti A. Wheat yield loss attributable to heat waves, drought and water excess at the global, national and subnational scales wheat yield loss attributable to heat waves, drought and water excess at the global, national and subnational scales Environ. Res. Lett. 12 2017 64008 10.1088/1748-9326/aa723b · DOI
- Authors
- Zampieri, M., Weissteiner, C. J., Grizzetti, B., Toreti, A., van den Berg, M., & Dentener, F.
- Affiliations
- European Commission (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Zampieri, Matteo
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 735
- Pages
- 139378
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7374405
- OpenAlex
- W3025045962
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Joint Research Centre
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- coefficient of variation, crop diversity, climate extremes, food security, agricultural management, France
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review