Cited by 99Water Quality Monitoring and AnalysisWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Real-time monitoring and prediction of water quality parameters and algae concentrations using microbial potentiometric sensor signals and machine learning tools

Open access
Saboe, Daniel, Ghasemi, Hamidreza, Gao, Ming Ming, Samardzic, Mirjana, Hristovski, Kiril D., Boscovic, Dragan, Burge, Scott R., Burge, Russell G. +1 more·2021·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The overarching hypothesis of this study was that temporal microbial potentiometric sensor (MPS) signal patterns could be used to predict changes in commonly monitored water quality parameters by using artificial intelligence/machine learning tools. To test this hypothesis, the study first examines a proof of concept by correlating between MPS's signals and high algae concentrations in an algal cultivation pond. Then, the study expanded upon these findings and examined if multiple water quality parameters could be predicted in real surface waters, like irrigation canals. Signals generated between the MPS sensors and other water quality sensors maintained by an Arizona utility company, including algae and chlorophyll, were collected in real time at time intervals of 30 min over a period of 9 months. Data from the MPS system and data collected by the utility company were used to train the ML/AI algorithms and compare the predicted with actual water quality parameters and algae concentrations. Based on the composite signal obtained from the MPS, the ML/AI was used to predict the canal surface water's turbidity, conductivity, chlorophyll, and blue-green algae (BGA), dissolved oxygen (DO), and pH, and predicted values were compared to the measured values. Initial testing in the algal cultivation pond revealed a strong linear correlation (R 2 = 0.87) between mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and the MPSs' composite signals. The Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) between the predicted values and measured values were <6.5%, except for the DO, which was 10.45%. The results demonstrate the usefulness of MPSs to predict key surface water quality parameters through a single composite signal, when the ML/AI tools are used conjunctively to disaggregate these signal components. The maintenance-free MPS offers a novel and cost-effective approach to monitor numerous water quality parameters at once with relatively high accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142876

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 99

Authors
Saboe, D., Ghasemi, H., Gao, M. M., Samardzic, M., Hristovski, K. D., Boscovic, D., Burge, S. R., Burge, R. G., & Hoffman, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Burge Environmental (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hristovski, Kiril D.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
764
Pages
142876
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092112152
Cited by
99
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Science
  • Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0013194)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
water quality monitoring, cyanobacteria, chlorophyll, turbidity, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH, irrigation canals, mixed liquor suspended solids, machine learning prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Arizona, Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Monitoring, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review