Strategic Evaluation of Limiting Factors Affecting Algal Growth—An Approach to Waste Mitigation and Carbon Dioxide Sequestration
Abstract
This work outlines major critical physico-chemical parameters that play a key role in increasing the fixation of CO 2 from coal-fired flue gas CO 2 into green microalgae biomass. Nitrogen concentration, gas flow rate, initial medium pH, and incident light intensity were determined to be the most important process variables with significant impact on CO 2 fixation. Therefore, NaNO 3 (500-3000 mg L-1), pH (6.8-8.0), light (50-200 mol m-2 s-1) and aeration (0.1-1.0 vvm) were varied to assess the biological assimilation potential of CO 2 from the flue gas. The parameters that resulted in maximal CO 2 fixation from raw flue gas, resulting in a maximum biomass density of 3.1 g L-1, were NaNO 3 = 1500 mg L-1, pH =7.2-7.5, incident light intensity = 133.33 mol m-2 s-1, and 0.5-0.75 vvm aeration without any cost-incurring flue gas pre-treatment step. The inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) was used to investigate heavy metals uptake from raw flue gas, and it was discovered that no net intake of trace metals had a significant influence on biomass production. The research lays the path for efficient large-scale microalgal cultivations for industrial uses, as well as bolstering the circular economy concept.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A crucial aspect is the identification and selection of factors that influence the intensification of microalgal biomass growth and the increase in the yield of target substances, including the optimisation of the chemical and physical parameters of the cultivation environment.
“Acrucial aspect is the identification and selection of factors that influence the intensification of microalgal biomass growth and the increase in the yield of target substances, including the optimisation of the chemical and physical parameters of the cultivation environment [15].”
From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Yadav, G., Mathimani, T., Sekar, M., Sindhu, R., & Pugazhendhi, A.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
- National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli (IN)
- National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (IN)
- Asia University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 796
- Pages
- 149049
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3180091580
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Keywords
- microalgae cultivation, CO2 sequestration, coal-fired flue gas, nitrogen content, sodium nitrate, pH, light intensity, aeration, heavy metal uptake, microalgal biomass, waste mitigation, circular economy
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Coal, Biomass, Carbon Sequestration, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review