Cited by 214Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalChemical Analysis and Environmental Impact

Global occurrence and probabilistic environmental health hazard assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in groundwater and surface waters

Open access
Sims, Jaylen L., Stroski, Kevin M., Kim, Sujin, Killeen, Grace, Ehalt, Ricardo, Simcik, Matt F., Brooks, Bryan W.·2022·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been used in consumer and military products since the 1950s but are increasingly scrutinized worldwide because of inherent chemical properties, environmental contamination, and risks to public health and the environment. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) identified 24 PFASs of interest for further study and possible regulation. We examined 371 peer-reviewed studies published since 2001 to understand the occurrence and distribution of 24 priority PFASs in global surface waters and groundwater. We identified 77,541 and 16,246 data points for surface waters and groundwater, respectively, with total PFAS concentrations ranging from low pg/L to low mg/L levels. Most data were from Asia, Europe, and North America with some reports from Oceania. PFAS information from other geographic regions is lacking. PFASs levels are consistently higher in rivers and streams followed by lakes and reservoirs and then coastal and marine systems. When sufficient data were available, probabilistic environmental hazard assessments (PEHAs) were performed from environmental exposure distributions (EEDs) to identify potential exceedances of available guideline values for each compound by matrix, region, and aquatic system. Specifically, exceedances of USEPA drinking water lifetime health advisory levels were up to 74% for PFOS in groundwater from Oceania and 69% for PFOA in North American groundwater. Our findings support selection…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151535

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among water bodies without acute contamination sources, PFAS are more common in surface water than groundwater.

    “Among water bodies without acute contamination sources, the PFAS content of surface water is much more extensively surveyed than that of groundwater, and PFAS are more common in surface water than groundwater (Munoz et al., 2017; Sims et al., 2022).”

    From PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns (2025) · cites this paper as Sims et al., 2022

  • Few studies have sought to characterize PFAS contamination profiles in public drinking water supplies that do not have a clear contamination source.

    “Few studies have sought to characterize PFAS contamination profiles in public drinking water supplies that do not have a clear contamination source (Gobelius et al., 2018; Sims et al., 2022).”

    From PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns (2025) · cites this paper as Sims et al., 2022

  • Compared to a literature review groundwater dataset, both detection rates and concentrations in the UDB are lower than the global average.

    “Compared to the groundwater dataset from a literature review [115], both the detection rates and concentrations in the UDB are lower than the global average.”
  • Rivers are often the aquatic system most affected by PFAS contamination.

    “Rivers are often the aquatic system most affected by PFAS contamination [115].”
  • The summed concentrations of PFAS are influenced by differences in the inclusion of compounds and the methodological change from the simple additive approach in DWD (2020) to the toxicology-based evaluation in the proposed EQS (2022), which accounts for differences in PFAS toxicity.

    “It is important to note that the summed concentrations of PFAS are influenced by differences in the inclusion of the compound and the methodological change from the simple additive approach in DWD (2020) to the toxicology-based evaluation in the proposed EQS (2022), which accounts for differences in PFAS toxicity [115].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 85 · Cited by 214

Authors
Sims, J. L., Stroski, K. M., Kim, S., Killeen, G., Ehalt, R., Simcik, M. F., & Brooks, B. W.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Bryan W.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
816
Pages
151535
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211761789
Cited by
214
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 11
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (W912HQ19C0050, ER19-1350)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, groundwater contamination, surface water contamination, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, aquatic ecosystems
MeSH terms
Environmental Health, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Groundwater, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review