Effects of microplastics and nanoplastics in shrimp: Mechanisms of plastic particle and contaminant distribution and subsequent effects after uptake
Open accessAbstract
To date, previous studies have reported the adverse effects of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) on both freshwater and marine organisms. However, the information on MPs' and NPs' effects on shrimp species is scarce. In addition, the factors influencing the distribution of these particles in aquatic systems have been explained, yet the mechanisms behind MPs and NPs distribution and consumption, specifically to crustaceans and shrimp, have not been elucidated in detail. The effects of MPs and NPs as well as plastic-carried contaminants and pathogens on shrimp are critical to shrimp production and subsequent human consumption. Recent findings are required to review and discuss to open up new avenues for emerging Shrimp and crustacean research for sustainability. This review summarizes the distribution and fate of MPs and NPs along with contaminants and pathogens and identifies potential risks to shrimp health. The transport of MPs and NPs is influenced by their plastic properties, hydrodynamics, and water properties. Additionally, the fate of these particles on a plastic surface (plastisphere) is regulated by contaminant properties. Pathogens thriving on plastic surfaces and contaminants adsorbed can reach aquatic organisms directly with plastic particles or indirectly after release to an aquatic environment. MPs and NPs can be absorbed by shrimp through their gills and mouth and accumulate in their internal organs. Innate immunity influenced the degree of survival rat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nanoplastics can infiltrate biological systems with great efficiency, accumulating in aquatic species such as fish, crustaceans, and shellfish.
“Notably, nanoplastics can infiltrate biological systems with great efficiency, accumulating in aquatic species such as fish, crustaceans, and shellfish.”
From Deciphering the toxic effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on erythropoiesis at single-cell resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Timilsina et al., 2023
Cites
Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., & Purnell, P. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014 · Cited by 3,873 · see citing works
Life in the “plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris
Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es401288x · Cited by 3,368 · see citing works
Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals
Lushchak, V. I. (2011) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.10.006 · Cited by 2,729 · see citing works
Van Cauwenberghe, L., Claessens, M., Vandegehuchte, M. B., & Janssen, C. R. (2015) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.008 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Fate of nano- and microplastic in freshwater systems: A modeling study
Besseling, E., Quik, J. T. K., Sun, M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.001 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Oberbeckmann, S., Osborn, A. M., & Duhaime, M. B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159289 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Interaction of chemical contaminants with microplastics: principles and perspectives
Fred-Ahmadu, O. H., Bhagwat, G., Oluyoye, I., Benson, N. U., Ayejuyo, O. O., & Palanisami, T. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135978 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Zhu, L., Zhao, S., Bittar, T. B., Stubbins, A., & Li, D. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121065 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Micro-by-micro interactions: How microorganisms influence the fate of marine microplastics
Rogers, K. L., Carreres‐Calabuig, J. A., Gorokhova, E., & Posth, N. R. (2020) · Limnology and Oceanography Letters · doi:10.1002/lol2.10136 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Saavedra, J., Stoll, S., & Slaveykova, V. I. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.135 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eun, J. K., Medical Research Institute, P. N. U., Medical Research Institute, P. N. U., Hyeon, M. S., Hansong, L., Soyul, A., Yejin, K., Chae, R. L., Kihun, K., Kyungjae, M., et al. (2025) · Zoological Research · doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2024.277 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Timilsina, A., Adhikari, K., Yadav, A. K., Joshi, P., Ramena, G., & Bohara, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- College of Menominee Nation (US)
- University of Idaho (US)
- University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bohara, Kailash
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 894
- Pages
- 164999
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381325726
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, nanoplastics, shrimp, Crustacea, gill uptake, innate immunity, gut microbiota, oxidative stress, shrimp health, aquaculture, plastisphere
- MeSH terms
- Microplastics, Animals, Biological Transport, Crustacea, Humans, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review