Cited by 181Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Microbial interactions within beneficial consortia promote soil health

Wu, Di, Wang, Weixiong, Yao, Yanpo, Li, Hongtao, Wang, Qi, Niu, Ben·2023·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

By ecologically interacting with various biotic and abiotic agents acting in soil ecosystems, highly diverse soil microorganisms establish complex and stable assemblages and survive in a community context in natural settings. Besides facilitating soil microbiome to maintain great levels of population homeostasis, such microbial interactions drive soil microbes to function as the major engine of terrestrial biogeochemical cycling. It is verified that the regulative effect of microbe-microbe interplay plays an instrumental role in microbial-mediated promotion of soil health, including bioremediation of soil pollutants and biocontrol of soil-borne phytopathogens, which is considered an environmentally friendly strategy for ensuring the healthy condition of soils. Specifically, in microbial consortia, it has been proven that microorganism-microorganism interactions are involved in enhancing the soil health-promoting effectiveness (i.e., efficacies of pollution reduction and disease inhibition) of the beneficial microbes, here defined as soil health-promoting agents. These microbial interactions can positively regulate the soil health-enhancing effect by supporting those soil health-promoting agents utilized in combination, as multi-strain soil health-promoting agents, to overcome three main obstacles: inadequate soil colonization, insufficient soil contaminant eradication and inefficient soil-borne pathogen suppression, all of which can restrict their probiotic functionality. Yet…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165801

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wu, D., Wang, W., Yao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., & Niu, B.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (CN)
  • Agro-Environmental Protection Institute (CN)
  • Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (CN)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Qi
  • Niu, Ben
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
900
Pages
165801
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385231930
Cited by
181
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
soil health, microbial consortia, microbial interactions, multi-strain probiotics, synthetic microbial communities, soil microbiome, biogeochemical cycles, soil colonization
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Microbial Interactions, Microbial Consortia, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review