Cited by 51Probiotics and Fermented FoodsListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Screening, probiotic properties, and inhibition mechanism of a Lactobacillus antagonistic to Listeria monocytogenes.

Yang, Xinyu, Peng, Zheng, He, Mengni, Li, Zhibin, Fu, Guihua, Li, Shaolei, Zhang, Juan·2024·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is one of the most lethal foodborne pathogens, and there is a lack of microorganisms that can strongly inhibit its growth. Safe lactic acid bacteria with probiotic and antibacterial properties are ideal sources of antagonistic bacteria. This study isolated a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum 4-10 that completely killed L. monocytogenes from northeastern Chinese sauerkraut. Probiotic characterization revealed broad-spectrum bacterial inhibition, antagonizing 16 Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal species. After tolerance to simulated intestinal and gastric fluids, the survival rate was >45 %. L. plantarum 4-10 was sensitive to chloramphenicol, doxycycline, erythromycin, and tetracycline, and exhibited good hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, and co-aggregation. It could disrupt the cell structure when co-cultured with L. monocytogenes and act as a lethal agent within 15 h. Through transcriptomic analysis and validation experiments, we found that L. plantarum 4-10 could inhibit the expression of L. monocytogenes membrane transport-related genes by producing bacteriocins, thus disrupting the cell membrane structure and inhibiting the growth, metabolic viability, and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes in a short time. In conclusion, L. plantarum 4-10 has good probiotic properties and antibacterial effects and shows excellent research and application prospects as a natural bacteriostat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167587

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 51

Authors
Yang, X., Peng, Z., He, M., Li, Z., Fu, G., Li, S., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
Jiangnan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Juan
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
906
Pages
167587
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387341442
Cited by
51
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22208125)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20221084)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD2101402)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
Lactobacillus plantarum, Listeria monocytogenes, antagonistic bacteria, probiotics, bacteriocins, antibacterial activity, foodborne pathogens, sauerkraut, cell membrane damage, membrane transport genes, biofilm formation, acid and bile tolerance, self-aggregation, co-aggregation, hydrophobicity, transcriptomics
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteriocins, Lactobacillus, Listeria monocytogenes, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review