The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Porosity regrowth during heat treatment of hot isostatically pressed additively manufactured titanium components
Open accessAbstract
X-ray computed tomography has been used to track the behaviour of individual pores found in selective electron beam melted additive manufactured titanium. Porosity was found to shrink below the detection limit of X-ray microtomography (< 5 μm) upon hot isostatic pressing. Spherical argon containing gas pores, which have a high internal gas pressure following hot isostatic pressing, have been found to progressively reappear and grow in proportion to their original as-built size during high temperature (β-anneal) treatments, whereas larger irregular low pressure pores did not reappear. The implications of these observations in terms of additive manufacturing are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Cited by
du Plessis, A., Yadroitsev, I., Yadroitsava, I., & Le Roux, S. G. (2018) · 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1089/3dp.2018.0060 · Cited by 550
Seifi, M., Gorelik, M., Waller, J., Hrabe, N., Shamsaei, N., Daniewicz, S., & Lewandowski, J. J. (2017) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 · Cited by 422
Wang, S., Ning, J., Zhu, L., Yang, Z., Yan, W., Dun, Y., Xue, P., Xu, P., Bose, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2022) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2022.08.014 · Cited by 279
du Plessis, A., & Macdonald, E. (2020) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101191 · Cited by 246
Sadeghi, E., Karimi, P., Momeni, S., Seifi, M., Eklund, A., & Andersson, J. (2019) · Materials Characterization · doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2019.02.016 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Tammas-Williams, S., Withers, P. J., Todd, I., & Prangnell, P. B.
- Venue
- Scripta Materialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 72-76
- ISSN
- 1359-6462 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2397286724
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
