Cited by 33High Entropy Alloys StudiesPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismHeusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties

Superconductivity with large upper critical field in noncentrosymmetric Cr-bearing high-entropy alloys

Open access
Xiao, Guorui, Yang, Wuzhang, Zhu, Qinqing, Song, Shijie, Cao, Guang-Han, Ren, Zhi·2023·Scripta Materialia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115099

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The μ0Hc2(0) is greater than the Pauli paramagnetic limit in a series of noncentrosymmetric cubic β-Mn-type Cr5+xMo35-xW12Re35Ru13C20 (0 ≤ x ≤ 9) HEA superconductors, and the μ0Hc2(0) approaches or even slightly exceeds its Pauli paramagnetic limit.

    “A further signature of the unconventional nature of HEA compounds is that μ 0Hc2(0) is greater than the Pauli paramagnetic limit in a series of noncentrosymmetric cubic β -Mn-type Cr5 + x Mo35x W12Re35Ru13C20 (0 ≤ x ≤ 9) HEA superconductors, and the μ 0Hc2(0) approaches or even slightly exceeds its Pauli paramagnetic limit 88 .”

    From Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Abstract says the alloys have upper critical fields comparable to the Pauli limit, with a maximum ratio of about 1.03 at x = 6. Table I (passage 6) gives ratios of 0.95, 0.96, 1.03, and 0.85 for x = 0, 3, 6, and 9, respectively. Thus the fields approach or slightly exceed the limit, but the claim that they are greater than it across the series is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Quantifying intrinsic ρN values remains challenging owing to the polycrystalline nature of high-entropy samples, where resistivity is largely influenced by grain boundary contributions.

    “However, quantifying the intrinsic ρ N values remains challenging owing to the polycrystalline nature of highentropy samples, where resistivity is largely in fl uenced by grain boundary contributions 57,88 .”

    From Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    The paper describes its HEA samples as polycrystalline and, in the passage on upper critical field (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable), links a resistivity tail under magnetic field to carbon at grain boundaries and weak links between superconducting grains. It does not say that grain boundaries largely influence normal-state resistivity or make intrinsic ρN difficult to quantify. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These β-Mn-type HEAs show bulk superconductivity, with Tc decreasing monotonically from 5.49 K to 3.35 K as the concentration of x increases.

    “These β -Mn-type HEAs show bulk superconductivity, with T c decreasing monotonically from 5.49 K to 3.35 K as the concentration of x increases.”

    From Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

  • The reduction in Tc in β-Mn-type HEAs is attributed to pair-breaking effects caused by the local moments of Cr.

    “This reduction in T c is attributed to pair-breaking effects caused by the local moments of Cr.”

    From Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. D. B. Miracle, O. N. Senkov, A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts, Acta Mater. 122 (2017) 448-511.
  2. F. Von Rohr, M. J. Winiarski, J. Tao, T. Klimczuk, R. J. Cava, Effect of electron count and chemical complexity in the Ta-Nb-Hf-Zr-Ti high-entropy alloy superconductor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016) E7144-E7150.
  3. J. Guo, H. Wang, F. Von Rohr, Z. Wang, S. Cai, Y. Zhou, K. Yang, A. Li, S. Jiang, Q. Wu, R. J. Cava, L. Sun, Robust zero resistance in a superconducting high-entropy alloy at pressures up to 190 gpa, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  4. G. Xiao, Q. Zhu, W. Yang, Y. Cui, S. Song, G.-H. Cao, Z. Ren, Centrosymmetric to noncentrosymmetric struc- tural transformation in a superconducting high-entropy alloy due to carbon addition, Sci. China Mater. (2022). URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-022-2144-x. · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Xiao, G., Yang, W., Zhu, Q., Song, S., Cao, G.-H., & Ren, Z.
Affiliations
  • Westlake University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ren, Zhi
Venue
Scripta Materialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
223
Pages
115099
ISSN
1359-6462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306643156
Cited by
33
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scripta Materialia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12050003)
  • Zhejiang University
  • Westlake University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties
Keywords
high-entropy alloys, superconductivity, upper critical field, noncentrosymmetric superconductors, chromium doping, bulk superconductivity, superconducting transition temperature, Pauli paramagnetic limit, magnetic pair breaking, lattice parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review