CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74Landfill Environmental Impact StudiesMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A method of landfill leachate management using internet of things for sustainable smart city development

Gopikumar, S., Raja, S., Robinson, Y. Harold, Shanmuganathan, Vimal, Chang, Hangbae, Rho, Seungmin·2021·Sustainable Cities and Society
DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102521
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. André, 2015, Quantifying physical structure changes and non-uniform water flow in cattle manure during dry anaerobic digestion process at lab scale: Implication for biogas production, Bioresource Technology, 192, 660, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.022 · DOI
  2. André, 2016, 177Electrical resistivity tomography to quantify in situ liquid content in a full-scale dryanaerobic digestion reactor, Bioresource Technology, 201, 89, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.033 · DOI
  3. Ariunbaatar, 2015, Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste, Applied Energy, 123, 143, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.035 · DOI
  4. Ayodele, 2020, Effect of collection efficiency and oxidation factor on greenhouse gas emission and life cycle cost of landfill distributed energy generation, Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101821 · DOI
  5. Bakhtiari, 2019, A coupled agent-based risk-based optimization model for integrated urban water management, Sustainable Cities and Society
  6. Balaei, 2020, Investigating the technical dimension of water supply resilience to disasters, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102077 · DOI
  7. Browne, 2013, Murphy Improving hydrolysis of food waste in a leach bed reactor, Waste Management, 33, 2470, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.06.025 · DOI
  8. Chanakya, 2008, Micro-scale anaerobic digestion of point source components of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Waste Management
  9. Darbandsari, 2020, Hamed Khorasani an agent-based conflict resolution model for urban water resources management, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102112 · DOI
  10. de Albuquerque, 2019, Toy user interfaces: Systematic and industrial mapping, Journal of Systems Architecture, 97, 77, 10.1016/j.sysarc.2018.12.001 · DOI
  11. De Gioannis, 2013, A review of dark fermentative hydrogen production from biodegradable municipal waste fractions, Waste Management, 33, 1345, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.02.019 · DOI
  12. Elsamadony, 2015, Potential of biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) using pilot-scale dry anaerobic reactor, Bioresource Technology, 196, 9, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.048 · DOI
  13. Elsamadony, 2015, Dry anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal waste with paperboard mill sludge and gelatin solid waste for enhancement of hydrogen production, Bioresource Technology, 191, 157, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.017 · DOI
  14. Fernández-Rodríguez, 2014, Dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes: Solid retention time optimization, Chemical Engineering Journal, 251, 435, 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.067 · DOI
  15. Ficco, 2019, Leaf: An open-source cybersecurity training platform for realistic edge-IoT scenarios, Journal of Systems Architecture, 97, 107, 10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.04.004 · DOI
  16. Ghanimeh, 2012, Bioresource technology mixing effect on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Bioresource Technology, 117, 63, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.125 · DOI
  17. Gimenez-Maranges, 2020, The transition to adaptive storm-water management: Learning from existing experiences in Italy and Southern France, Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 1, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102061 · DOI
  18. Giovanna, 2020, Optimal assets management of a water distribution network for leakage minimization based on an innovative index, Sustainable Cities and Society
  19. Hashempour, 2020, Assessing vulnerability to climate change for total organic carbon in a system of drinking water supply, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101904 · DOI
  20. Hu, 2020, Effect of soil and water conservation measures on regime-based suspended sediment load during floods, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102044 · DOI
  21. Hutter, 2020, Adapting the concept of artificial DNA and hormone system to AUTOSAR environments, Journal of Systems Architecture, 104, 10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.101700 · DOI
  22. Jagadabhi, 2011, Two-stage anaerobic digestion of tomato, cucumber, common reed and grass silage in leach-bed reactors and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, Bioresource Technology, 102, 4726, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.052 · DOI
  23. Jain, 2015, A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 142, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091 · DOI
  24. Jha, 2011, Research advances in dry anaerobic digestion process of solid organic wastes, African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 14242
  25. Karthikeyan, 2013, Bio-energy recovery from high-solid organic substrates by dry anaerobic bio-conversion processes: A review, Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 12, 257, 10.1007/s11157-012-9304-9 · DOI
  26. Lehtomäki, 2008, Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production, Bioresource Technology, 99, 3267, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.072 · DOI
  27. Li, 2020, Stakeholders’ willingness to pay for the new construction and demolition waste landfill charge scheme in Shenzhen: A contingent valuation approach, Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101663 · DOI
  28. Maghmoumi, 2020, Environmental and economic assessment of sustainable municipal solid waste management strategies in Iran, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102161 · DOI
  29. Nixon, 2013, Evaluation of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India using the hierarchical analytical network process, Energy, 59, 215, 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.052 · DOI
  30. Nizami, 2011, Design, commissioning, and start-up of a sequentially fed leach bed reactor complete with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket digesting grass silage, Energy & Fuels, 25, 823, 10.1021/ef101739d · DOI
  31. Pacher, 2020, Evaluation of the dependability of an artificial DNA in a dynamic automotive environment, Journal of Systems Architecture, 107, 10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101736 · DOI
  32. Ponsá, 2011, Anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste with several pure organic cosubstrates, Biosystem Engineering, 108, 352, 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.01.007 · DOI
  33. Rajasekhar, 2015, Energy generation from municipal solid waste by innovative technologies – Plasma gasification, Procedia Materials Science, 10, 513, 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.06.094 · DOI
  34. Singh, 2011, An overview for exploring the possibilities of energy generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian scenario, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4797, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.071 · DOI
  35. Strickling, 2020, Simulation of containment and wireless emergency alerts within targeted pressure zones for water contamination management, Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101820 · DOI
  36. Talyan, 2008, State of municipal solid waste management in Delhi, the capital of India, Journal of Waste Management, 28, 1276, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.017 · DOI
  37. Tyagi, 2014, Enhancement in hydrogen production by thermophilic anaerobic codigestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge – optimization of treatment conditions, Bioresource Technology, 164, 408, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.013 · DOI
  38. Velmurugan, 2011, Anaerobic digestion of vegetable wastes for biogas production in a fed-batch reactor, International Journal of Emerging Science, 1, 478
  39. Venkateswara Rao, 2010, Biogas generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in India, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2086, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.031 · DOI
  40. Yadav, 2019, Sustainable collection and transportation of municipal solid waste in urban centers, Sustainable Cities and Society

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gopikumar, S., Raja, S., Robinson, Y. H., Shanmuganathan, V., Chang, H., & Rho, S.
Affiliations
  • Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
  • National Engineering College (IN)
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
  • Sejong University (KR)
Corresponding author
Rho, Seungmin
ORCID
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
66
Pages
102521
ISSN
2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.scs.2020.102521
OpenAlex
W3090414210
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sustainable Cities and Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2019-0-00136)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
Internet of Things, smart cities, solid waste segregation, Arduino, leachate treatment, mesophilic digestion, remote process monitoring, IoT cloud, turbidity, suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, cod, organic load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review