The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling air quality prediction using a deep learning approach: Method optimization and evaluation
Abstract
Abstract Air pollution is one of the hot issues that attracted widespread attention from urban and society management. Air quality prediction is to issue an alarm when severe pollution occurs, or pollution concentration exceeds a specific limit, contributing to the measure-taking of relevant departments, guiding urban socio-economic activities to promote sustainable urban development. However, existing methods have failed to make full use of the temporal features from spatiotemporal correlations of air quality monitoring stations, and achieved poor performances in long-term predictions (up to or above 24h-predictions). In this study, we proposed a deep learning framework to predict air quality in the following 24 h: a neural network with a temporal sliding long short-term memory extended model (TS-LSTME). The model integrated the optimal time lag to realize sliding prediction through multi-layer bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM), involving the hourly historical PM2.5 concentration, meteorological data, and temporal data. We applied the proposed model to predict the next 24 h average PM2.5 concentration in Jing-Jin-Ji region, with the most severe air pollution in China. The proposed model had better stability and performances with high correlation coefficient R2 (0.87), compared to the multiple linear regression (MLR), the support vector regression (SVR), the traditional LSTM, and the long short-term memory extended (LSTME) models. Moreover, the proposed model can achieve PM2.5 concentration predictions with high accuracy in long-term series (48 h and 72 h). We also tested the model to predict O3 concentration. The proposed model could be applied for other air pollutants. The proposed methods can significantly improve air quality prediction information services for the public and provide support for early warning and management of regional pollutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Cited by
IoT enabled environmental toxicology for air pollution monitoring using AI techniques
Asha, P., Natrayan, L., Geetha, B. T., Beulah, J. R., Sumathy, R., Varalakshmi, G., & Neelakandan, S. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112574 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Mao, W., Wang, W., Jiao, L., Zhao, S., & Liu, A.
- Venue
- Sustainable Cities and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 102567
- ISSN
- 2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093869481
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling air quality prediction using a deep learning approach: Method optimization and evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102567
- The paper
- Mao, W., Wang, W., Jiao, L., Zhao, S., & Liu, A. (2021). Modeling air quality prediction using a deep learning approach: Method optimization and evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.