The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COVID-19 cases prediction by using hybrid machine learning and beetle antennae search approach
Open accessAbstract
The main objective of this paper is to further improve the current time-series prediction (forecasting) algorithms based on hybrids between machine learning and nature-inspired algorithms. After the recent COVID-19 outbreak, almost all countries were forced to impose strict measures and regulations in order to control the virus spread. Predicting the number of new cases is crucial when evaluating which measures should be implemented. The improved forecasting approach was then used to predict the number of the COVID-19 cases. The proposed prediction model represents a hybridized approach between machine learning, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and enhanced beetle antennae search swarm intelligence metaheuristics. The enhanced beetle antennae search is utilized to determine the parameters of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and to improve the overall performance of the prediction model. First, an enhanced beetle antennae search algorithm has been implemented that overcomes deficiencies of its original version. The enhanced algorithm was tested and validated against a wider set of benchmark functions and proved that it substantially outperforms original implementation. Afterwards, the proposed hybrid method for COVID-19 cases prediction was then evaluated using the World Health Organization’s official data on the COVID-19 outbreak in China. The proposed method has been compared against several existing state-of-the-art approaches that were tested on the same datasets. The proposed CESBAS-ANFIS achieved R2 score of 0.9763, which is relatively high when compared to the R2 value of 0.9645, achieved by FPASSA-ANFIS. To further evaluate the robustness of the proposed method, it has also been validated against two different datasets of weekly influenza confirmed cases in China and the USA. Simulation results and the comparative analysis show that the proposed hybrid method managed to outscore other sophisticated approaches that were tested on the same datasets and proved to be a useful tool for time-series prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,010
ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system
Jang, J.-S. R. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.256541 · Cited by 16,254
Chan, J. F.-W., Yuan, S., Kok, K.-H., To, K. K.-W., Chu, H., Yang, J., Xing, F., Liu, J., Yip, C. C.-Y., Poon, R. W.-S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30154-9 · Cited by 8,944
Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, Gorbalenya, A. E., Baker, S. C., Baric, R. S., de Groot, R. J., Drosten, C., Gulyaeva, A. A., Haagmans, B. L., Lauber, C., Leontovich, A. M., et al. (2020) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z · Cited by 8,403
Sohrabi, C., Alsafi, Z., O'Neill, N., Khan, M., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., & Agha, R. (2020) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034 · Cited by 6,069
A New Metaheuristic Bat-Inspired Algorithm
Yang, X.-S. (2010) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6 · Cited by 4,905
An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R
James, G. M., Witten, D., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2018) · doi:10.25334/q4ht55 · Cited by 2,912
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems
Gandomi, A. H., Yang, X.-S., & Alavi, A. H. (2013) · Engineering with Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y · Cited by 2,257
Cited by
A systematic review on AI/ML approaches against COVID-19 outbreak
Dogan, O., Tiwari, S., Jabbar, M. A., & Guggari, S. (2021) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00424-8 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Zivkovic, M., Bacanin, N., Venkatachalam, K., Nayyar, A., Djordjevic, A., Strumberger, I., & Al-Turjman, F.
- Venue
- Sustainable Cities and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 102669
- ISSN
- 2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3114266307
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COVID-19 cases prediction by using hybrid machine learning and beetle antennae search approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102669
- The paper
- Zivkovic, M., Bacanin, N., Venkatachalam, K., Nayyar, A., Djordjevic, A., Strumberger, I., & Al-Turjman, F. (2021). COVID-19 cases prediction by using hybrid machine learning and beetle antennae search approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.