A systematic review of the health co-benefits of urban climate change adaptation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is strong evidence on the positive public health outcomes from engaging with nature and biodiversity and from living near urban green spaces in cities.
“There is strong evidence on the positive public health outcomes from engaging with nature and biodiversity and from living near urban green spaces in cities (44, 47, 56–62).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 162 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Sharifi, A., Pathak, M., Joshi, C., & He, B.-J.
- Affiliations
- Hiroshima University (JP)
- Ahmedabad University (IN)
- Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (IN)
- Chongqing University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Pathak, Minal
- Venue
- Sustainable Cities and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 103190
- ISSN
- 2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3183904448
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainable Cities and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- urban climate adaptation, health co-benefits, urban public health, nature-based solutions, critical infrastructure, urban planning and design, early warning systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
