Teledermatology: An Update
Abstract
Dermatology is perhaps the most visual specialty in medicine, making it ideally suited for modern telemedicine techniques, as has been shown in a number of recent studies investigating feasibility and reliability of teledermatology. It has generally demonstrated high levels of concordance in diagnosis and management plans compared with face-to-face consultations. Teledermatology also has been used for various purposes, including triage, diagnostic and management services, and second-opinion services for primary care practitioners. It has been set up in a number of ways: (1) direct referral for primary care using images and clinical history sent to secondary care dermatology services for second opinion and for triage referrals and (2) facilitating community-based clinics led by nurses or general practitioners. Moreover, in the last years new fields in teledermatology have grown up. Teledermoscopy is a promising area for melanoma screening as well as for the diagnosis and management of equivocal pigmented skin lesions. The feasibility of mobile teledermatology and mobile teledermoscopy recently has been proven, and these new facilities have the potential to become an easy applicable tool for everyone and may open the door for a new flexible triage system for detection of skin cancer in general and melanoma in particular. The implementation of virtual slide systems for teledermatopathology has allowed avoiding the limitations imposed by conventional microphotography. Finally, web consultations in dermatology are a rather new tool that became available in the last years and teledermatologic services through the Internet offer many possibilities, including continuing medical education, on-line atlases and databases, and specific web application suited for teledermatology (ie, www.telederm.org).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adoption of teledermatology (including teledermatoscopy) has been widespread compared with other areas in telemedicine.
“Adoption of teledermatology (including teledermatoscopy) has been widespread compared with other areas in telemedicine, driven by the availability of numerous commercial products to acquire and analyze imagery [36], by the user satisfaction and positive attitude of dermatologists towards its uptake [37], and by the substantial evidence of its clinical effectiveness [383940].”
From Recent directions in telemedicine: Review of trends in research and practice (2015) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Massone, C., Wurm, E. M. T., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R., & Soyer, H. P.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of Graz (AT)
- Venue
- Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-105
- ISSN
- 1085-5629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128366147
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
- Keywords
- teledermatology, telemedicine, teledermoscopy, melanoma screening, virtual slides, triage, second opinion, primary care referral, pigmented skin lesions, skin cancer detection
- MeSH terms
- Dermatology, Humans, Skin, Skin Diseases, Telepathology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review