Validation of a data-driven multi-ancillary services framework for photovoltaic/Storage units via power hardware-in-the-loop testing
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents the experimental validation of a unified multi-ancillary services (AS) architecture for distributed photovoltaic–battery energy storage (PV-DBESS) systems using power hardware-in-the-loop (PHiL) testing. The focus is on voltage regulation (VR) and voltage unbalance mitigation (VUM), with full decoupling between the two control schemes to ensure interference-free operation. Experiments are conducted on a small-scale distribution network using a hybrid PHiL setup that combines real-time simulation with physical hardware, bridging the simulation-to-practice gap. A detailed three-phase four-leg converter model with embedded VR and VUM algorithms is implemented in RSCAD, and simplified controllable current source models are also evaluated to balance computational efficiency with accuracy. The results demonstrate that the proposed control strategies effectively mitigate overvoltage and unbalance events across varying operating conditions and network characteristics. The VUM scheme leverages reactive power through virtual damping susceptances, while the VR scheme coordinates active and reactive power to regulate the positive-sequence voltage. Interoperability with conventional constant-power converters is also verified. The study confirms that the proposed AS architecture provides a robust and practical solution for enhancing reliability and hosting capacity in active distribution networks, while indicating its potential suitability for future large-scale real-time studies and integration with advanced grid operation systems, particularly through the use of simplified converter models.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20
- Authors
- Pippi, K. D., Kryonidis, G. C., Papadopoulos, T. A., Feng, Z., Syed, M. H., & Burt, G. M.
- Affiliations
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Papadopoulos, Theofilos A.
- Feng, Zhiwang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-03
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 102133
- ISSN
- 2352-4677 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7126090917
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon Europe
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Real-time simulation and control systems
- Keywords
- ancillary services, photovoltaic-battery energy storage system, distributed energy resources, voltage regulation, voltage unbalance mitigation, power hardware-in-the-loop, four-leg converter, reactive power control, active distribution networks, hosting capacity, overvoltage suppression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review