Cited by 22Streptococcal Infections and TreatmentsSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsVasculitis and related conditions

Lack of association between the HLA-DRB1 locus and post-streptococcal reactive arthritis and acute rheumatic fever in italian children

Simonini, Gabriele, Porfirio, Berardino, Cimaz, Rolando, Calabri, Giovanni Battista, Giani, Teresa, Falcini, Fernanda·2004·Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective Post-streptococcal reactive arthritis (PSReA) may be a variant of acute rheumatic fever (ARF), but there still is debate on the relationship between the 2 entities. Possible associations with HLA class II antigens of PSReA (DRB1*01) and ARF (DRB1*16) were described previously in white Americans. To confirm these findings, we studied DRB1 alleles in a group of Italian children with PSReA and ARF. Methods We performed low-resolution HLA-DRB1 typing by a sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction method in 33 children with PSReA and 25 children with ARF. We also compared the DRB1 genotypes of our patients with 200 normal subjects from the same geographic area and typed in the same laboratory with the same methods. Results The allele distributions at the DRB1 locus observed in PSReA patients, ARF patients, and controls were not significantly different from each other (chi-square test with small numbers, P = .65). The positivity for each of the 13 HLA-DRB1 alleles was compared in disease groups (PSReA and ARF) and controls, and failed to show any significant association. Comparisons of the frequency of the DRB1*01 allele among PSReA, ARF, and controls did not show any statistical differences. No significant difference in the frequency of DRB1*16 was present between ARF vs the control group, between ARF vs PSReA, and in PSReA patients when compared with controls. Conclusions Our data do not confirm in Italian patients the previously reported associations of DRB1*0…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Simonini, G., Porfirio, B., Cimaz, R., Calabri, G. B., Giani, T., & Falcini, F.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Simonini, Gabriele
Venue
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
553-558
ISSN
0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052670408
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
post-streptococcal reactive arthritis, acute rheumatic fever, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB1*01, HLA-DRB1*16, HLA class II association, genetic susceptibility, children, Italian population
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Histocompatibility Testing, HLA-DR Antigens, Humans, Italy, Male, Rheumatic Fever, Streptococcal Infections, Cohort Studies, Arthritis, Reactive, HLA-DRB1 Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review