Cited by 41Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVasculitis and related conditionsSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases

Rituximab usage in systemic lupus erythematosus-associated antiphospholipid syndrome: a single-center experience

Wang, Chrong-Reen, Liu, Ming-Fei·2016·Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

Abstract

Objectives Although the data from primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) suggests a beneficial effect of rituximab usage, its therapeutic role remains to be defined in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated APS, a complex clinical situation with thrombotic events and lupus activity. Methods A single-center retrospective analysis of rituximab usages in APS was performed in 800 hospitalized SLE patients. Results There were 63 SLE-associated APS cases with 6 on rituximab therapy, all female aged 37.7 ± 9.0 years with 1 catastrophic and 16 thrombotic episodes. Therapeutic indications included warfarin failure despite the adequate target international normalized ratio with an average duration of 17.3 ± 11.2 months between the thrombotic recurrences. After the rituximab therapy, there was no relapse of thrombosis with a mean follow-up period of 39.3 ± 20.9 months, and a decrease in lupus activity (SLEDAI-2K, 9.7 ± 5.5 to 5.3 ± 2.2). Infection complications were observed, including episodes of bronchitis and urinary tract infection. Conclusions In this single-center study with largest case numbers and a long-term follow-up period, there were no recurrent thrombotic events after the rituximab therapy, implicating further consideration of large-scale trials enrolling more ethnic groups to evaluate its therapeutic role in SLE-associated APS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of vitamin K antagonists over low-dose aspirin in antiphospholipid syndrome with first arterial thrombosis is supported by observational studies showing a lower likelihood of recurrent thrombosis among patients treated with vitamin K antagonists versus low-dose aspirin alone.

    “The use of VKA over LDA is supported by data from observational studies that showed a lower likelihood of recurrent thrombosis among patients with APS and prior arterial thrombosis (mainly stroke) treated with VKA versus LDA alone.31 32”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 41

Authors
Wang, C.-R., & Liu, M.-F.
Affiliations
National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chrong-Reen
Venue
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
102-108
ISSN
0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2282564845
Cited by
41
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Internal Medicine
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Keywords
rituximab, systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombosis, lupus disease activity, SLEDAI-2K, infectious complications, bronchitis, urinary tract infection
MeSH terms
Rituximab, Adult, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review