Rituximab usage in systemic lupus erythematosus-associated antiphospholipid syndrome: a single-center experience
Abstract
Objectives Although the data from primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) suggests a beneficial effect of rituximab usage, its therapeutic role remains to be defined in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated APS, a complex clinical situation with thrombotic events and lupus activity. Methods A single-center retrospective analysis of rituximab usages in APS was performed in 800 hospitalized SLE patients. Results There were 63 SLE-associated APS cases with 6 on rituximab therapy, all female aged 37.7 ± 9.0 years with 1 catastrophic and 16 thrombotic episodes. Therapeutic indications included warfarin failure despite the adequate target international normalized ratio with an average duration of 17.3 ± 11.2 months between the thrombotic recurrences. After the rituximab therapy, there was no relapse of thrombosis with a mean follow-up period of 39.3 ± 20.9 months, and a decrease in lupus activity (SLEDAI-2K, 9.7 ± 5.5 to 5.3 ± 2.2). Infection complications were observed, including episodes of bronchitis and urinary tract infection. Conclusions In this single-center study with largest case numbers and a long-term follow-up period, there were no recurrent thrombotic events after the rituximab therapy, implicating further consideration of large-scale trials enrolling more ethnic groups to evaluate its therapeutic role in SLE-associated APS patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of vitamin K antagonists over low-dose aspirin in antiphospholipid syndrome with first arterial thrombosis is supported by observational studies showing a lower likelihood of recurrent thrombosis among patients treated with vitamin K antagonists versus low-dose aspirin alone.
“The use of VKA over LDA is supported by data from observational studies that showed a lower likelihood of recurrent thrombosis among patients with APS and prior arterial thrombosis (mainly stroke) treated with VKA versus LDA alone.31 32”
From EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Wang, C.-R., & Liu, M.-F.
- Affiliations
- National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Chrong-Reen
- ORCID
- Wang, Chrong-Reen
- Venue
- Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-108
- ISSN
- 0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2282564845
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Internal Medicine
- National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
- Keywords
- rituximab, systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombosis, lupus disease activity, SLEDAI-2K, infectious complications, bronchitis, urinary tract infection
- MeSH terms
- Rituximab, Adult, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review