The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiomics in breast cancer classification and prediction
Abstract
Breast Cancer (BC) is the common form of cancer in women. Its diagnosis and screening are usually performed through different imaging modalities such as mammography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. However, mammography and ultrasound-imaging techniques have limited sensitivity and specificity both in identifying lesions and in differentiating malign from benign lesions, especially in presence of dense breast parenchyma. Due to the higher resolution of magnetic resonance images, MRI represents the method with the higher specificity and sensitivity among all the available tools, in both lesions' identification and diagnosis. However, especially for diagnosis, even MRI has limitations that are only partially solved if combined with mammography. Unfortunately, due to the limits of all these imaging tools, in order to have a certain diagnosis, patients often receive painful and costly bioptics procedures. In this context, several computational approaches have been developed to increase sensitivity, while maintaining the same specificity, in BC diagnosis and screening. Amongst these, radiomics has been increasingly gaining ground in oncology to improve cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Radiomics derives multiple quantitative features from single or multiple medical imaging modalities, highlighting image traits which are not visible to the naked eye and hence significantly augmenting the discriminatory and predictive potential of medical imaging. This review article aims to summarize the state of the art in radiomics-based BC research. The dominating evidence extracted from the literature points towards a high potential of radiomics in disentangling malignant from benign breast lesions, classifying BC types and grades and also in predicting treatment response and recurrence risk. In the era of personalized medicine, radiomics has the potential to improve diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, monitoring, image-based intervention, and assessment of therapeutic response in BC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957
Statistical pattern recognition: a review
Jain, A. K., Duin, P. W., & Mao, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.824819 · Cited by 6,767
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype
(2017) · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0339 · Cited by 6,593
Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine
Lambin, P., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Deist, T. M., Peerlings, J., de Jong, E. E. C., van Timmeren, J., Sanduleanu, S., Larue, R. T. H. M., Even, A. J. G., Jochems, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 · Cited by 5,688
Shmueli, G. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/10-sts330 · Cited by 2,517
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
Beyond Accuracy, F-Score and ROC: A Family of Discriminant Measures for Performance Evaluation
Sokolova, M., Japkowicz, N., & Szpakowicz, S. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11941439_114 · Cited by 1,974
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008 · Cited by 1,686
Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation
Wong, T.-T. (2015) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.009 · Cited by 1,562
Metadata
- Authors
- Conti, A., Duggento, A., Indovina, I., Guerrisi, M., & Toschi, N.
- Venue
- Seminars in Cancer Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 238-250
- ISSN
- 1044-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023189324
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiomics in breast cancer classification and prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.04.002
- The paper
- Conti, A., Duggento, A., Indovina, I., Guerrisi, M., & Toschi, N. (2021). Radiomics in breast cancer classification and prediction. Seminars in Cancer Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.