Cited by 80Acute Kidney Injury ResearchCell death mechanisms and regulationFerroptosis and cancer prognosis

An Overview of Pathways of Regulated Necrosis in Acute Kidney Injury

Kers, Jesper, Leemans, Jaklien C., Linkermann, Andreas·2016·Seminars in Nephrology

Abstract

Necrosis is the predominant form of regulated cell death in acute kidney injury (AKI) and represents results in the formation of casts that appear in the urine sedimentation, referred to as muddy brown casts, which are part of the diagnosis of AKI. Pathologists referred to this typical feature as acute tubular necrosis. We are only beginning to understand the dynamics and the molecular pathways that underlie such typical necrotic morphology. In this review, we provide an overview of candidate pathways and summarize the emerging evidence for the relative contribution of these pathways of regulated necrosis, such as necroptosis, ferroptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition-mediated regulated necrosis, parthanatos, and pyroptosis. Inhibitors of each of these pathways are available, and clinical trials may be started after the detection of the most promising drug targets, which will be discussed here. With the global burden of AKI in mind, inhibitiors of regulated necrosis represent promising means to prevent this disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RCD is a primary etiological determinant in diseases with irreversible loss of post-mitotic tissues such as myocardial infarction and neurodegeneration.

    “On the one hand, RCD constitutes a primary etiological determinant in diseases associated with the irreversible loss of post-mitotic tissues (e.g., myocardial infarction, neurodegeneration) [687, 752, 851, 869, 1035, 1036].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 136 · Cited by 80

Authors
Kers, J., Leemans, J. C., & Linkermann, A.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Kers, Jesper
Venue
Seminars in Nephrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
139-152
ISSN
0270-9295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2461826943
Cited by
80
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Keywords
acute kidney injury, regulated necrosis, acute tubular necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition, parthanatos, pyroptosis, molecular pathways, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Pyroptosis, Humans, Kidney, Mitochondria, Necrosis, Permeability, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Acute Kidney Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review