CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mineralization of C.I. Reactive Blue 19 by ozonation combined with sonolysis: Performance optimization and degradation mechanism

He, Zhiqiao, Lin, Lili, Song, Shuang, Xia, Min, Xu, Lejin, Ying, Haiping, Chen, Jianmeng·2008·Separation and Purification Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identified fragments for ozonation of Reactive Blue 19 ranged from a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and propandioic acid, to a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and oxalic acid, and to a mixture of phthalic acid and unspecified carboxylic acids.

    “Identified fragments ranged from a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and propandioic acid 68 , to a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and oxalic acid 92 and to a mixture of phthalic acid and unspecified carboxylic acids 69 .”

    From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [92]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, Z., Lin, L., Song, S., Xia, M., Xu, L., Ying, H., & Chen, J.
Venue
Separation and Purification Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
376-381
ISSN
1383-5866
DOI
10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.005
Cited by
116
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review