Cited by 91Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchPhytochemistry and Biological Activities

Extraction optimisation using water/glycerol for the efficient recovery of polyphenolic antioxidants from two Artemisia species

Shehata, Emad, Grigorakis, Spyros, Loupassaki, Sofia, Makris, Dimitris P.·2015·Separation and Purification Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.06.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 91

Authors
Shehata, E., Grigorakis, S., Loupassaki, S., & Makris, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (GR)
  • University of the Aegean (GR)
Corresponding author
Makris, Dimitris P.
Venue
Separation and Purification Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
149
Pages
462-469
ISSN
1383-5866 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W569522995
Cited by
91
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Separation and Purification Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
Keywords
polyphenol extraction, Artemisia arborescens, antioxidant polyphenols, extraction kinetics, activation energy, glycerol concentration, liquid-to-solid ratio, chlorogenic acid, flavone C-glycosides, green extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review